LibLink: Tim Farron: British voters must have the final say on the Brexit deal

In today’s Guardian, Tim Farron sets out the case for the people to decide in a referendum whether they wish to accept the terms of Brexit or remain in the EU after all.

He sets out what Theresa May is up to:

Theresa May’s tactic is clear: to accuse anyone who dares question her headlong, blindfold charge towards hard Brexit of being democracy deniers. This despite it looking increasingly likely that the result of her reckless, divisive Brexit will be to leave the single market and not reduce immigration – the very opposite of what Brexiteers pitched to the people.

Then he sets out the case for a referendum on the deal:

It was May’s choice to plumb for the hardest and most divisive Brexit, taking us out of the single market before she has even tried to negotiate. That’s why we believe the people should have the final say. Someone will: it will either be politicians or the people. If the people decide they don’t like the deal on offer, they should have the option to remain in the European Union.

This is simply too big to trust to politicians. May wants to hijack David Cameron’s mandate from the general election to deliver hard Brexit. Meanwhile, the recent tough talk from Keir Starmer won’t hide Labour’s feeble deeds: voting for Brexit, failing to stick up for the right of EU nationals to remain, and even now only really threatening to abstain rather than vote against the final deal. I have heard of loyal opposition, but this is craven.

And he points out that the outcome is likely to be far from what people voted for – and that’s going to be the fault of blinkered ministers:

That agreement will depend on the consent of parliaments (and in some cases, regional parliaments) of 27 member states. It could take years. And that’s if Whitehall has the capacity: some have suggested it needs an additional 30,000 civil servants. So much for a Brexit saving, and £350m a week extra for the NHS, and so much for a government taking back control. Steve Woolcock, the expert leading the training for the negotiations, has said Britain risks signing poor deals because ministers are failing to recognise the sheer complexity of Brexit.

He goes on to outline the severe consequences for trade, business and jobs. You can read the whole article here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary in print, on air or online.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

  • A disaster for us all. Utterly ashamed of the British public, the Tories, Labour and UKIP right now standing up for immoral protectionism.

    Proud to stand up for our global liberal corporate values.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Alex Macfie
    Let's hope that the good voters of Clacton put that pile of rubbish into the Bin. "Libertarian values"? Sorry but no, FaЯage is no "libertarian" in any real s...
  • Matt Wardman
    Heh. I'm not watching the world cup in a personal gesture of solidarity with Canada, and opposition to Trump. So I did not watch it. I'm not a big football f...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Simon, "Why are you calling us British one minute, and Manx the next? " </em? Don't you regard yourself as British? If this designation of ...
  • Dennis Delice
    Thank you for your priceless insights, David; you bring to light how co-operatives are in not a stranger to the liberal tradition, and have roots in British lib...
  • Paul WalterPaul Walter
    @peter “They should make up their minds” Er, well they have. They’re self governing crown dependencies. Thanks for the information and debate, all. I a...