Somewhat unexpectedly, one of the most immediate changes brought about by televising the House of Commons was to male MPs’ hairstyles.
Until then, it had been the habit amongst some of the, er…, thinning on top MPs to brush their hair forward so that when you looked at them face to face it appeared that they had a bountiful mop of hair above their forehead. Unfortunately, if you looked down on their head from a slightly elevated position, this impressive wave of hair instead looked like a toupe that had slipped forward leaving a bald patch further back.
And where were the new Commons cameras? At a slightly elevated position, looking down.
Cue a rapid change of hairstyle from MPs such as Bryan Gould.
I’m sure there is a moral in this somewhere…
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
"Making Liverpool a global force," Liverpool Lib Dem proposals for regenerating our economy
Before Paddington Bear there was Mary Plain
Burnham and the devolved national governments
Ravensworth Castle visit
Kemi Badenoch's dismissive attitude towards local government
Jana
cim
Simon Marlow
David Wright
Ruth Bright
2 Comments
…A bit surprised you have not mentioned that the only party that had campaigned for years for the televising of Parliament was the Liberal Party (not that it did them any good, in fact the televising of Prime Minister’s Question Time only seemed to make the third party all the more marginalised).
Mr Young has a typical selfish, “big party ” view of why people do things , = self-interest.
Liberal motivation is very different: the party believes in radical changes which will benefit everyone, not just those that suit its electoral chances.