Liverpool loses World Heritage Status accolade

The loss of World Heritage Status for our City, even though it was expected, is a huge blow to our international prestige and will, without a doubt, affect our tourism and inward investment.

When, under Lib Dem control, we received the status in 2004 it helped our work, alongside winning the European Capital of Culture, in changing round the national and global and view of our City. Until these two things happened, we were just Beatles and Football globally and a poor man’s version of Coronation Street within the UK. People shunned our City for visiting, living and investment and the people of Wirral demanded a CH post code and not an L one!

Then people realised that Liverpool was much, much more than that. We were a City of huge culture and an important role in the World’s past present and future. The first decade of this Century was the best in terms of growth and employment that Liverpool had seen for many years. However, much of that has been lost in Mayor Joe Anderson’s wasted decade when the World Heritage Status was just a, “plaque on the wall in the Town Hall”.

I have lost count of the people who have come to Liverpool to our Conference Centre and Arena and who have said to me, “I didn’t know Liverpool was like that, I’m going to bring my family next visits”. Then 3 months later they’d tell me that they had indeed just done that, and the family loved it too.

Some will say, ‘but the buildings are still there’. That is true but what we will lose is the desire to preserve them and ensure that all buildings within key areas must be built to the highest possible standards so that in decades time people will still want to visit us.

Already we have a planning application in for a boring and banal development at Waterloo Dock which will damage the views of the area in the final approach towards the Pier Head and the Birkenhead Docks for Liners and Ferries. The quality of our buildings old and proposed will be much harder to defend with no Status to lose.

Not, it must be said, that the Council during the last philistine decade, has been any good at high quality development. Look at the fiascos over the Futurist cinema and the possible zipwire in the City Centre which would have destroyed the appearance of 4 listed buildings.

But all is not lost if Liverpool shakes itself down and decides in this new post-Joe Anderson era, to really build up rather than ignore the things that give our Liverpool brand its Unique Selling Point. Liverpool must dare to be different and the way it can do this most effectively is to use its buildings and environment and other cultures to give Liverpool a must-go-to quality.

Liverpool must continue to act in strategic and planning terms as if the Status was still in place. We must emphasise and build on our past. We must preserve and find new uses for our 981 listed buildings and 50+ conservation areas. This must be done rather than allow the haphazard largely low-grade development which took place over the last decade.

Liverpool will thrive if we make a positive and unique ‘brand’ for our City, which recognises and builds on its past rather than create a city which has no USP to compete with all the other cities seeking global attention.

Liverpool needs to send a message from now on that the Philistine Decade has drawn to a close and that a new era of proud Scousers in a proud City will ensue.

* Cllr Richard Kemp CBE is the Leader of the Liverpool Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Local government and Op-eds.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Could Councillor Kemp confirm that he and his colleagues supported the building of the new Everton football stadium (his blog 20 January, 2020), but the erection of the stadium on the dockside is one of the reasons why Liverpool has lost its World Heritage status ?

  • Richard Kemp 19th Aug '21 - 9:03am

    The Planning Committee is a quasi-judicial committee which operates outside politcial structures and has to operate within a national planning regime that is hostile to local decision making. Our one Lib Dem on the committee voted for the application on that basis.
    BUT whilst Labour have tried to sell this as a UNESCO v Everton FC issue it does so because the EFC issue was only the final straw in a long running feud between UNESCO and the previous Mayor. By itself the planning decision for EFC would not have endangered the UNESCO status.

  • Alasdair Brooks 19th Aug '21 - 9:32am

    Don’t know if this is helpful to Richard, but sharing just in case…

    I wrote the following statement on Liverpool’s loss of World Heritage status in my capacity as President of the Society for Post-Medieval Archaeology (Europe’s leading professional society for the archaeology of the post-1500 period):

    http://www.spma.org.uk/news/statement-on-liverpools-loss-of-world-heritage-status/

  • David Garlick 21st Aug '21 - 10:46am

    Must keep the buiders happy and their profits rolling in.. Cynical but I suspect true for the two main Parties. The difficult to swallow bit is that the builders are still happy even though they have to build in different, often more expensive, ways to the maimum profit plans they start out with. Development = good is far from the truth if not properly guided and in sympathy with the surroundings. Obvious, well know but often lost sight of in the pursuit of ‘look what we built’ politics and without sufficient long term thinking.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Michael BG
    Simon R The restraints on government spending are not the amount they can borrow but the amount they should spend. It is too much money chasing too few goods...
  • Simon R
    Great to see the practical suggestions in this article, both for how to get more people and women from ethnic minorities involved in politics, and to get more p...
  • Simon R
    @Nonconformistradical: Sure, and you need to make sure the system being used is accurate. That's the responsibility of the developers of the system, working wit...
  • George Thomas
    New Zealand deal is worth between -.01 and +0.1 to the economy and puts farmers across the UK at a disadvantage which is especially worrying in places such as N...
  • Jeff
    Roland 21st Oct '21 - 7:34pm: …with the current downward pressure on oil consumption, we can expect there to be a glut of oil in the world market i...