Mark Pack

Local elections: further post-results analysis

By | Tue 6th May 2008 - 4:15 pm

Michael Thrasher has an interesting piece on the Sky News website, particularly explaining the difference in the seat change figures between those published by Sky and the BBC. As has become a consistent pattern over several years now, his national vote share projections put the Liberal Democrats two per cent lower than the BBC’s figures.

Several people (including myself) have commented on how well the Liberal Democrats did against the Conservatives in those Parliamentary seats that are key to the next general election. Martin Tod reports from Winchester than in fact the Liberal Democrat vote there hit a 10-year high last week. Meanwhile, in Chris Huhne’s Eastleigh constituency not only are there now no Conservative councillors (remember all the Conservative talk during the leadership election about how they could take his seat?), but the share of the vote for the party was 51%, up from 42% four years ago. There was a net swing from the Conservatives to the Liberal Democrats of 1% so, although the Conservatives perhaps should have benefited from the collapse of the UKIP vote in local elections there, they have actually fallen further behind the Liberal Democrats.

One fact I’ve not seen remarked upon: this year’s gains means the Liberal Democrats have gained seats in six out of the last seven years of local elections.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Stuart 6th May '08 - 8:55pm

    Is it asking too much for BBC analysts to spot these kinds of trends on the night? I noticed that we were doing well in our southern seats as the results trickled in, yet the BBC was too busy reporting that the Tories were triumphing across the North… the basis of this seems to be victory in Bury (a little bit of Greater Manchester) and North Tyneside (somewhere near Newcastle) – forget the facts that we took Hull, and Sheffield and Burnley.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Chris Cory
    @Ruth Bright. An answer you question, of course we do. Winning more council seats. We may only have the support of 15% of voters but we have become a very bro...
  • Jana
    “ Young people who grew up here increasingly cannot afford to stay” Let’s be honest - when more people want to buy a house in an area than are availabl...
  • William Wallace
    For the record, I think that it's people like me who should accept that they have to be taxed more: that's better-off, but not enormously-wealthy, retirees with...
  • John Bicknell
    In the GE of 2024 the central issue was 'get the Tories out', and the Lib Dems benefited from this, chiefly in the south of England. The next GE will not revol...
  • David Evans
    Indeed Jason, you are absolutely right. Just add to it all rural areas that have received nothing but a few slops for years and now Labour have stolen huge amo...