Mark Pack

Local elections: further post-results analysis

By | Tue 6th May 2008 - 4:15 pm

Michael Thrasher has an interesting piece on the Sky News website, particularly explaining the difference in the seat change figures between those published by Sky and the BBC. As has become a consistent pattern over several years now, his national vote share projections put the Liberal Democrats two per cent lower than the BBC’s figures.

Several people (including myself) have commented on how well the Liberal Democrats did against the Conservatives in those Parliamentary seats that are key to the next general election. Martin Tod reports from Winchester than in fact the Liberal Democrat vote there hit a 10-year high last week. Meanwhile, in Chris Huhne’s Eastleigh constituency not only are there now no Conservative councillors (remember all the Conservative talk during the leadership election about how they could take his seat?), but the share of the vote for the party was 51%, up from 42% four years ago. There was a net swing from the Conservatives to the Liberal Democrats of 1% so, although the Conservatives perhaps should have benefited from the collapse of the UKIP vote in local elections there, they have actually fallen further behind the Liberal Democrats.

One fact I’ve not seen remarked upon: this year’s gains means the Liberal Democrats have gained seats in six out of the last seven years of local elections.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Stuart 6th May '08 - 8:55pm

    Is it asking too much for BBC analysts to spot these kinds of trends on the night? I noticed that we were doing well in our southern seats as the results trickled in, yet the BBC was too busy reporting that the Tories were triumphing across the North… the basis of this seems to be victory in Bury (a little bit of Greater Manchester) and North Tyneside (somewhere near Newcastle) – forget the facts that we took Hull, and Sheffield and Burnley.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Margaret
    It's a few years ago now, but I remember having a problem with a car we had hired in Alaska, and having a long argument with a call-handler somewhere in the 'lo...
  • Caracatus
    The thing is we can have lower taxes (for most) and better public services. The madness of the lost war on drugs which cost billions. Sorting social care, th...
  • paul barker
    Can London build its way out of this crisis ? Londons population has gone up by more than half since the 90s & all the "Plans" are for it to go up more. Lo...
  • Steve Nash
    I agree with KP that the International Aid and diplomatic Budget should increased, to challenge both Immigration and the need for Defence. It may not be the ch...
  • Tom Arms
    @ John Kelly: I certainly didn't mean to imply that Gaza is peaceful. Sadly, civilians continue to die, humanitarian conditions remain appalling and Israel cont...