The House of Lords yesterday dismissed fears surrounding new regulations allowing religious institutions to celebrate same-sex civil partnerships on their premises. Some campaigners hard argued that such rules could force them to do so against their will, an argument that was laid to rest by Peers. In doing so, they gave the green light to liberal religious organisations to allow same-sex couples to register their civil partnerships under their auspices.
The Lords debated Conservative Peer Lady O’Cathain’s motion to have new regulations on civil partnerships delayed because of fears that equality campaigners could use the Equality Act 2010 or the Human Rights Act 1998 to force religious organisations into honouring their civil partnerships against the organisations’ will. These concerns were comprehensively dismissed by, amongst others, Lib Dem peers who gave assurances that nobody would be forced to perform same-sex civil partnerships should they not wish to. The assurances given were enough for the motion to be withdrawn.
Commenting, Lord Rennard said
The debate today made clear that there was no real merit in the argument advanced that religious organisations could be forced against their will into allowing civil partnerships to be conducted on their premises. It is probably not a co-incidence that those peers who tried to construe a legal argument to this effect seemed to be those most opposed to the principles of civil partnerships.
While Lynne Featherstone also welcomed the withdrawal of Lady O’Cathain’s motion, which was restricted to the rules on civil partnerships, she made it clear that she wanted the government to go further:
I look forward to working equally constructively with all interested people and organisations as we move ahead with the Coalition Government’s plan to open up marriage to same-sex couples. Our commitment to equality runs deep, as next year’s consultation on equal marriage will show.
A heartening episode for those interested in the equal treatment of same-sex couples who want to celebrate their love for each other, and another example of Lib Dem Parliamentarians standing up for freedom and equality.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
"Winston and David" on stage
The Joy of Six 1551
Reform MP starts digging her own Standards hole
Labour councillor joins Lib Dems in Portsmouth
Andy Burnham's Big Promises - Now Comes the Difficult Part
After the murder of Ann Widdecombe, we must all be more careful of the language we use in political life
George Thomas
John Reed
Alex Macfie
4 Comments
And of course a good decision to get out of the way before the Government’s consultation into equal marriage early next year!
The report in Pink News is here:
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2011/12/15/house-of-lords-rejects-challenge-to-religious-civil-partnership-rules/
What about an opportunity for humanists to conduct civil partnership, or for that matter, wedding ceremonies?
@Richard Church – If I understand it correctly, I believe Humanists can already conduct Civil Partnerships and will be able to conduct marriage ceremonies. I may be mistaken and this only applies to Scotland. The Humanists are certainly fully supportive of Equal Marriage in Scotland and have indicated this in the recent consultation.