MPs expenses – yes we can!

Let the halls of the internet ring with celebration! Following Brown’s climbdown over Thursday’s vote on MPs expenses a few hours ago (looks like nobody told poor old Margaret Beckett), it’s starting to dawn on the citizens of cyberspace that, hey, we actually DID something! Enough contacts were made, enough comments, twitters, links, emails, posts and messages, to prompt those letters, pinging off apparently to over 90% of MPs (yes, I am watching you, Mr Grayling).

Tom at MySociety (where Bad Science is among the commenting celebrants) is deservedly delirious with joy:

Make no mistake. This is new, and it reflects the fact that the Internet generation expects information to be made available, and they expect to be able to make up their own minds, not be spoon fed the views of others. This campaign was always about more than receipts, it was about changing the direction of travel, away from secrecy and towards openness.

Matthew Cain has a lengthier dissection of why the campaign was successful. I agree with him particularly that the short time limit was incredibly important in motivating people. As was the clarity expected of the result – either the Commons would vote it down, or they would not (or, as happened, the government would take it off the table). Essentially we’re talking a campaigning objective with the same clear parameters as a football match, and that is key to the whole thing.

But there’s one point I would add to his analysis – this was also a very clear-cut issue in the public mind already. Venally corrupt politicians have been the target of popular campaigning since the dawn of time – it’s not a hard sell. The familiarity of the issue and the strength of the feelings it arouses was an absolutely vital precondition to raising awareness of the impending vote. It’s not something that can be reproduced with just any campaign objective. And we should probably, as we whizz around the ether patting ourselves on the back, bear in mind that we have years and years of traditional, dogged dead-tree media work to thank for that backstory.

But the doubts and the post-mortem are for another day! For now, spare a thought for the pole-axed “Austin”, who simply comments at MySociety:

This was the first time I’ve ever emailed my MP.

What an initiation.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.


Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Michael BG
    Joe Bourke, I asked you how many people you think are structurally unemployed. You said 0.8% of the workforce are long-term unemployed. Are you saying that i...
  • Jeff
    Peter Chambers 3rd Dec '21 - 3:12pm: The private sector under neo-liberalism simply does not invest for the long term nor for the public good. ...
  • Jeff
    Peter Martin 3rd Dec '21 - 3:49am: If plants need CO2 for their growth, then more of it should be better. Plants (including trees) evolved to ...
  • Joe Bourke
    Tax reform should be an increasingly important element of LibDem policy going forwaed. Martin Wolf writes in the FT ...
  • Martin
    Laurence Cox: Valérie Pécresse's route to the run off is by no means assured. A recent sondage puts le Pen and Zemmour ahead of Pécresse. I am sure Péc...