Stephen Tall

New Hampshire: will it be Obama and McCain’s night? (UPDATED)

By | Wed 9th January 2008 - 12:15 am

The polls are pointing to triumphs for Democrat presidential hopeful Barack Obama, and his Republican counterpart, John McCain, in today’s New Hampshire primary.

The final Reuters/C_SPAN/Zogby tracking poll shows Obama widening his lead over Hillary Clinton to 13 points, 42% to 29%, with John Edwards at 17%.

For the Republicans, McCain has also pulled away from Mitt Romney, taking a 36% to 27% lead, followed by Mike Huckabee at 10%, and Rudy Giuliani and Ron Paul both at 9%.

Turnout looks likely to be huge – an estimated 500,000 have cast their votes, up from the record of 396,000 set in 2000. CQ Politics reports that state officials “expect 260,000 Democratic ballots and 240,000 Republican ballots to be cast, a reflection in part of shifts of Republican voters to independent status and of independent voters toward Democratic candidates in recent elections. In addition, it’s the first contest since 1928 that neither party has had a sitting president or vice-president seeking the nomination.”

UPDATE: And then again, maybe not. Exit polls initially make it too close to call between Obama and Clinton, though with McCain tapped to win on the Republican side. Even if Obama does just win, a narrow defeat for Clinton may allow her to re-use Bill Clinton’s 1992 “comeback kid” tag given the expectations that had built up in the last two days for a large Obama victory in New Hampshire.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in LDVUSA.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Anonymous 9th Jan '08 - 10:27am

    It seams now that Clinton has won. The Democratic race is still wide open.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Blake
    There were fewer MPs speaking than I expected and one or two seemed to be always at the microphone....
  • Geoff Reid
    When we live in the worst of times for democracy it ought to be the best of times for saying what we are for....
  • Peter Wrigley
    @what are we for? Thanks for this refreshingly frank article. There should be no problem in understanding what we- it’s the preservation, improvement a...
  • Andrew Tampion
    Mick Taylor is right to point out that speculation in the absence of facts is not helpful. In any case either you believe in localism or you don't. If a local p...
  • George Hadjiyiannaki
    Community within a place can be very difficult to feel a part of when you’re renting and not secure. We need to make it easier for especially young people to ...