Nick Clegg and Paddy Ashdown win the argument on Afghan interpreters

The BBC reports:

Up to 600 Afghan interpreters who worked alongside British troops are to be given the right to live in the UK, government sources have confirmed.

The plan marks a climbdown from ministers who had decided they should not get the same UK resettlement rights as interpreters in the Iraq conflict.

Afghan interpreters who worked on the front line for a year or more will initially be offered a five-year visa.

This is something, as we reported 3 weeks ago, that Nick Clegg and Paddy Ashdown have been arguing for.

Earlier this week, Paddy Ashdown said that it was Downing Street that was blocking UK visas for the interpreters. Now it seems that arguments from Nick Clegg, Paddy and other Liberal Democrats have won the day.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Rightly so and long overdue. Apart from the morality aspect,, if our government were to treat WOGS (foreigners Working On Government Service) as expendable and this became known worldwide, how could our troops hope to recruit the local allies they need in future conflicts abroad ?

  • Geoffrey Payne 22nd May '13 - 12:21pm

    It is a welcome step forward, but notice that to qualify you must have been an interpreter for at least a year.

  • Interpreter by day and Al Qaeda by night.
    Discuss.

  • Eddie Sammon 22nd May '13 - 8:38pm

    Very good point Martin. Unfortunately many “liberals” prefer kneejerk reactions towards “liberal” principles instead, whilst forgetting about security. Worst still, anyone who disagrees would probably get called a name.

  • A Social Liberal 22nd May '13 - 11:25pm

    This government has condemned even more to at least a lifetime of fear and quite possibly death at the hands of the Taliban because only ‘terps’ who are currently employed will be allowed in.

    Shame on them.

  • I’m really sorry to go off on a tangent but somebody was BUTCHERED in London today by two lunatics. What has the Lib Dem party got to say on the issue? Anything? The EDL are on the streets and people are attacking mosques and somebody has posted that they are watching Tea Cake Challenge!

    Are you deliberately trying to lose voters or are you just taking the mickey out of the public???

  • Eddie Sammon 23rd May '13 - 7:58am

    Liberals have had a problem with being soft on crime and defence for many years. I think it is primarily because they generally don’t live in working class areas so don’t have to live with the fear every day.

    Not going into Iraq was a good decision, but it’s just offensive when liberals are more concerned about gay marriage and their obsession with civil liberties, than they are about the real dangers of the day.

    Is it no wonder that we do so poorly in working class areas?

  • Eddie Sammon 23rd May '13 - 8:04am

    When I first joined the party I was welcomed with internal nuclear warfare about closed evidence proceedings for terrorism cases when national security was at risk. It was very off putting and made me think that liberals live in a parallel universe, more interested in their pet projects than the public’s concerns.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarBrian Edmonds 1st Jun - 12:58pm
    That’s all we need – a Varifakis groupie. All I’ve ever seen of him is a silver-tongued fantasist with a glib line in special pleading;...
  • User AvatarCatherine Royce 1st Jun - 12:40pm
    I agree with Wera. This is the clearest and most concise strategy which encompasses our principles and values that I have read so far. Equidistance...
  • User AvatarMary Reid 1st Jun - 12:40pm
    @Ian Sanderson - so pleased you spotted all those factors. A lot of work went into making it as inclusive as possible. Note the two...
  • User AvatarTom Harney 1st Jun - 12:23pm
    Nick Shcherban’s contribution is very interesting. Certainly my opinion is that most people are looking for a new way of having accountability in a democracy....
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 1st Jun - 12:05pm
    @Ian Sanderson (RM3) If this site had a "Like" button, then I would press it for your comment!
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 1st Jun - 11:54am
    @Peter Martin In a bizarre way, it did feel as though the 2019 General Election was won by anti-Corbyn Labour MPs who had learnt from...