The Independent View: An invitation to ORGCon 2013: the UK’s leading digital rights conference

It becomes clearer every year how technology affects our rights and civil liberties in all sorts of ways. Businesses or governments try to block access to more information online. States make ever more demands for powers to surveil their citizens. Some of the laws governing what we can say on the Internet are too strict, with people punished severely for saying something online that would not be an offence if it was said in the local pub.

Open Rights Group’s national conference ‘ORGCon’ is the place to learn about, discuss and debate how technology affects our freedoms and democracy in these myriad ways. It’s an annual event featuring the biggest and best speakers on ‘digital rights’.

This year the conference will be on Saturday June 8th at the Institute of Engineering and Technology in central London. Full details are available on the ORGCon website.

We’re delighted that two legends of digital rights will be delivering the keynote talks.

John Perry Barlow co-founded the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and is a former Wyoming rancher and Grateful Dead lyricist. His legendary “Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace”, written in 1996, set the digital rights field alive.

Professor Tim Wu coined the phrase ‘network neutrality’ and wrote ‘The Master Switch’, a highly acclaimed book that looks closely at who controls the Internet.

As well as our two keynotes, ORGCon will feature an array of leading technology, legal and policy experts. Privacy International will tell us about the new digital arms trade in surveillance technology. The Intellectual Property Office will be there to explain the most recent changes to copyright. There’ll be talks about new privacy laws, protecting children online, free speech on the Internet, and how to have creative careers in the digital age.

Liberal Democrats have been heavily involved in many of these issues. From grassroots activists up to the Deputy Prime Minister, for example, Lib Dems played a pivotal role in getting the Home Office to drop the illiberal and oppressive Snooper’s Charter from the Queen’s Speech. At ORGCon we’ll be discussing the latest on how to win this ongoing fight over surveillance laws with the authors of our recent report “Digital Surveillance: Why the Snooper’s Charter is the wrong approach”.

It is only the engagement of citizens, activists and party members that will ensure technology helps increase our freedoms and improve our democracy – rather than undermining both.

So do come along, and help us put the world to digital rights! Full programme details and tickets are available at the ORGCon website.

Anyone who signs up to donate to ORG at least £5 per month will get a free ticket to ORGCon and a free copy of “The Master Switch” by Tim Wu, keynote speaker at ORGCon2013. See our website for details of this offer.

The Independent View‘ is a slot on Lib Dem Voice which allows those from beyond the party to contribute to debates we believe are of interest to LDV’s readers. Please email [email protected] if you are interested in contributing.

* Peter Bradwell is Policy Director at Open Rights Group, a digital rights campaign group.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds and The Independent View.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Alex Macfie
    By-election campaigns rarely refer back to the circumstances that caused the by-election. As I have noted, it didn't in Eastbourne (or if it did, it was in the ...
  • Alex Macfie
    "An election where the choices are one party-approved candidate and an assortment of racists (if Batley & Spen is anything to go by) doesn’t really serve ...
  • Andy Boddington
    We should not contest this election or any other that occures after a murder. Otherwise that creates a danger that some people may think that murder is a way to...
  • Nonconformistradical
    I think the murders of Airey Neave and Ian Gow were very different situations from those of Jo Cox and Sir David Amess. Both earlier victims appear been clearly...
  • Steve Comer
    I think we need to distinguish between respect for an MP who was murdered and tacit support for their party. By standing down in a by-election we do the latter...