Nick Clegg holds firm on snoopers’ charter

Nick Clegg has indicated that he will not change his position on the so called “snoopers’ charter” despite calls for him to do so by four former home secretaries.  A group of politicians, including Liberal Democrat peer Lord Carlile wrote to the Times (£) to say that the Bill was necessary:

It has always been a requirement, and always will be, that such intrusive intercepts are subject to time-limited warrants. Their use is guided by a strict criterion of necessity and proportionality, and are only permitted to protect national security and counter serious criminal conduct. We find it odd that many critics of the Bill prefer to champion the rights of corporations over democratically accountable law-enforcement agencies Good counter terrorism is about learning from previous plots and exploiting intelligence. Communications data is a vital tool in that armoury.

The Liberal Democrat leader is under constant pressure to agree to the measure under which every website we visit would be stored for a year. He has said continually that the proposal is disproportionate and unworkable.

Jack Straw, David Blunkett, Alan Johnson and Kenneth Baker are not what you would call ardent defenders of civil liberties. In fact, Straw would have been quite happy to lock people up for 3 months without charge, something which, as the BBC reports, Nick Clegg mentioned when asked about their letter:

But Mr Clegg said on Friday that he rejected any claim that his opposition to the Communications Data Bill had endangered lives and said it was important to “get the balance right”.

“We need to make sure the police and the security services have the powers that they need to keep us safe, that’s why we are going to do some more work for instance on how you match IP addresses to mobile devices,” he said.

“But we also have to get the balance right and I think that the proposal that every website that you visit should be stored on a database is not proportionate nor workable.”

He added: “These former home secretaries will know from their own experience the dangers of knee-jerk reactions, over-the-top reactions, to the difficult events we encounter in this country.”

He pointed to the history of Labour’s efforts to extend the period terrorist suspects could be held without charge, first to 90 then to 42 days – both of which ended in defeat for the then-Labour government.

It is to his credit that Nick Clegg is prepared to withstand this sort of pressure to  protect our internet activity from indiscriminate state intrusion. As we reported the other day, Paddy Ashdown, who probably  understands more about the detail of these issues than we will ever know, holds a similar view. This is an issue which is not going to go away and will challenge us after the 2015 election. There is a lot more holding firm to do and we should, in my view, be doing even more to get our position heard on this. Nick’s clear, consistent message is very welcome and the party must show its overwhelming support for him by getting out there and winning the arguments with him on the doorstep.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Joe Bourke
    Yanukovych served two custodial sentences for robbery and assault in his youth. He was backed by Putin in the 2004 Presidential elections. However, the electio...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Those who believe that the Ukrainian focussed events of 2014 were totally without foreign involvement, might find the attached article of interest. https://geo...
  • Joe Bourke
    Ukraine voted overwhelmingly for independence in 1991 and under the 1994 Budapest Memorandum their sovereignty was guaranteed by Russia, the USA and the UK in e...
  • Russell
    @Steve It wasn't a coup. There were widespread protests against Yanukovych given his corruption, and going against parliament by signing a deal with putin rath...
  • Phillip Bennion
    We were able to pay tribute to Robert at the beginning of ALDE Council this morning. Representing the Liberal Democrats I was able to outline Robert’s contrib...