Here’s the paperwork from the recent Italian referendum on nuclear power. Concise questions don’t seem to be their style…
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
A plea from a member – more ambition and less equine pacification please… (Nick Baird)
-
Will the real Green party that cared about people and planet please stand up? (Kobe Bibbon)
-
We need better conversations on AI and the environment (Josh Matthews)
-
How to spot a Racist (Ben Rich)
-
Councils must help music – so music can help their communities flourish (Charlie Clinton & Josh Matthews)
-
Why I'm fighting these plans
-
Ready for tomorrow
-
Latest voting intention and leadership ratings opinion polls
-
Reform councillor breaches rules by being leader of his own political party
-
Beware the pitiless quicksands of Rutland Water
-
Charlie Maynard resigns from Lib Dem front bench and calls for no confidence vote in Ed Davey
-
Peter Kellner: Zack Polanski should have won at a canter
-
Liverpool near bottom of the league for recycling
-
Labour's recovery in by-elections continues.
-
Vote Tory, get Reform?
Recent Comments
John Studholme
I Agee with every word of the above. I used Tony’s manuals to achieve control of South Lakeland District Council and to get Tom Farron elected an MP. His me...
Jeff
David 9th Oct '26 - 10:13am: Some very useful food for thought for the party. Here's the next course... Well good folks of Br...
Nick Baird
The problem in 2019 was "Vote Lib Dem, Get Jeremy Corbyn", as was being illegally fly-posted around Cheltenham on polling day.......
David Wright
The problem in 2019 wasn't that we were going to "rejoin the EU if we won", but that we were going to do so without another referendum first, something we'd bee...
Sarah
I am glad to hear that Charlie and others are pushing Ed for change. He’s ignored the stagnant polls and the frustration among MPs for far too long. He’s be...



4 Comments
And if you don’t have time to read the whole question, just remember – “Vote Yes to Vote No to Nuclear Power!” … Are we [i]sure[/i] they knew what they were voting for? 😀
From having read the press digest before this referendum, the Italians seem to have refused to follow their equivalents of The Sun and Daily Mail and voted against not only nuclear power expansion but also water privatisation.
Shame on another nation which last month took fright at a very modest reform, a nation which was either too apathetic or too stupid to notice it was being lied to.
How difficult is that to come to terms with, if not to understand?
What does the question translate to in English?
The question says, New nuclear power stations – partial repeal of the law
The answer being yes if you want to repeal the law and allow new nuclear plants (it was made illegal in Italy in 1987 to build new nuclear power stations) and no if you want to keep the law and prevent new nuclear power.
So yes to nuclear power or no to nuclear power – quite simple really. All the text below is the detailed explanation of the amendments to legislation required to effect the change, which really need to be printed on the page as the public are voting on the amendments directly, if the vote had been positive the law would have changed without the need for parliament to take action.