Observations of an Ex-Pat: Mind the gap

Mind the Gap. Three very familiar monosyllabic words for anyone who has travelled on the London Underground.

The taped announcement is a warning to beware of the potentially dangerous space between the railway carriages and the platform.

But it has a political meaning too. Any political novice will also tell you to mind the gap. Look for the space that isn’t being filled by the other parties and plug it—fast.

Well, at the moment there is a yawning chasm as the traditional parties race to head off  threats from the right and left, leaving a vacuum in the centre—the traditional winning ground.

But have the divisions that currently afflict Western societies become so acute that the centre ground is now politically unviable? We will find out—or at least be presented with a good indication— at the end of April and then again in May.

That is when the French elect their president. And it is looking increasingly as if the battle will be between the far right Marine Le Pen and her National Front Party and Emmanuel Macron’s  newly-formed En Marche  (English translation:Forward).

A few weeks ago the political landscape looked completely different. The two top contenders were Marine Le Pen and Francois Fillon. Macron and the Socialist candidate Benoit Hamon were also-rans.

Then along came Fillon-gate. It was revealed that the Republican presidential candidate paid his wife nearly a million Euros out of government money for work she never did. The revelations appear to have been a fatal blow to the presidential aspirations of Fillon and a fibulator-type boost to the hopes of Macron who overnight leapt to the number two slot in the opinion polls.

Macron has several things in common with Donald Trump. He is a businessman. He has never held elected office. His rise to power has been meteoric – private sector to economic adviser to minister of the economy in two years.

But that is where the comparison ends. Macron is young–39.  Most of all, Emmanuel Macron is a straight down the middle, pro-Europe, Free market, old fashioned middle of the road political, cultural and economic centrist liberal. When he speaks it is with the dispassionate fact-filled voice of common sense rather than the tub-thumping populist post-truth rhetoric that has come to dominate Western politics.

French voters had hoped that Francois Fillon would fill that role. But he moved the Republican Party to the right to counter the threat of anti-immigrant, anti-EU National Front candidate Marine Le Pen. Then he was caught with his hand in the till.

Socialist Benoit Hamon is campaigning on an unelectable far-left platform. At a time when the French economy is struggling to stay afloat the former education minister proposes to reduce the working week from 35 to 32 hours, tax companies using robots and wants to introduce a universal basic income. Hamon’s policies hitched to the disastrous administration of Socialist President Francois Hollande means it is unlikely that the socialists will do better than a poor fourth place.

Looming over the French political scene is Marine Le Pen. The darling of the far-right is currently holding the number one spot—27 percent according to a Valentine’s Day poll.

But France has a two-round presidential polling system.  Anyone can put their name on the ballot paper in the first round on 23rd April. And if any of the candidates achieve the highly unlikely goal of 51 percent of the electorate then they become president. If no one does—and none one ever has—then the top two candidates move to the second round on May 7th and the winner of that round moves into the Elysee Palace.

The National Front is a solid vote of determined right-wing activists, but so far they have repeatedly failed to move beyond a third of the electorate.

At the moment, opinion polls say that Macron would win 69 percent of the vote in round two run-off between Len Pen and himself. If he does, then Emmanuel Macron could  set Europe back on a liberal centrist path.

* Tom Arms is foreign editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and author of “The Encyclopedia of the War” and the recently published “America Made in Britain". He has a weekly podcast, Transatlantic Riff.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • Lorenzo Cherin 17th Feb '17 - 12:51pm

    A very good piece , well done , Tom !

    I have always thought Francois Bayrou the man for over a decade the voice of the sensible centre, both politically and personally the man who deserved to win, as with our party here, the French prefer the old two party duopoly .

    Now is the moment when he needs to back Macron. It is the only sensible thing to do by a sensible man.

    The new kid on the block is the only game in town.

  • Andrew McCaig 17th Feb '17 - 7:02pm

    We should not forget the amazing victory of Trudeau in Canada as well when discussing this “Liberalism is dead: populist-nationalism is in charge forever” idea…

  • Nick Collins 18th Feb '17 - 1:00pm

    @ David Wright. Yup, we had a penchant for idiotic slogans in those days. We went into the second general election in 1974 with the slogan “one more heave”!
    Oh, yes, and it was about that time that one could purchase books of Jeremy Thorpe matches. When they were all used, the legend inside the back cover was revealed: “Jeremy Thorpe is matchless”.

    Happy days.

  • Richard Underhill 18th Feb '17 - 1:31pm

    Canadian PM Justin Trudeau has visited US President Donald J. Trump, but neither has changed policy. If trump wants to renegotiate the North American free Trade Agreement he will need to recognise that Canada is an interested party, as well as a member state of NATO and has a long border with continental USA and with Alaska. Canada does not automatically do what USA does, for instance at the start of WW2, Canada decided promptly what to do, but the USA remained neutral.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • David Raw
    @ theakes. No surprise there, theakes. Despite EU membership being a prominent and distinctive Liberal policy going back to the Grimond days sixty years ago...
  • Joe Bourke
    The BofE in its announcement ...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Joe, Sorry I should have made it clear that I was talking about mortgage rates which are around 6.5% in Australia and over 7% in the USA. I'm sceptical ...
  • Sandy Smith
    @Martin An interesting observation…reminds me that the old Clause 4 of the Labour Party constitution used to speak about “securing for the workers, by hand...
  • Martin
    Jonathan Calder: You appear to imply that 'professional' and 'working class' are mutually exclusive terms. When I read the article, I did wonder what 'profes...