Opinion: Emerging markets could mean the end of the elephant, but it’s not too late

For some years I have been sponsoring an African Elephant called Grace. It was a birthday present that I have never had the heart to cancel. She is fortunate enough to live in a conservation area in Kenya. Grace is one of approximately 400,000 African Elephants still alive in the world, their population having been slashed by 50% since 1989, driven predominantly by the ivory trade. Despite an increasing shift in western attitudes very little has changed. Ever expanding globalisation and the economic crisis has resulted in several fluctuations in ivory demand, perpetuated by international ivory trade deals that have flooded the market with ‘historic stocks’ creating an unsustainable demand curve.

2013 marked the 40th anniversary of the adoption of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) which led to a ban on the trade of ivory in 1989, but still 8% of the African Elephant population is poached every year. CITES was responsible for failed market manipulation in the years leading up to the the ban. Only partial trade bans were given to Botswana, South Africa, Namibia and Zimbabwe under Article II. This fragmented approach has had a serious economic effect on emerging markets like China, Thailand and India which has a strong cultural identity to ivory and still remain the largest sources of demand.

The biggest threat to elephants in 2014 will be the increasingly prominent middle-class in China and India. Oscar Holland and Sijia Chen of the Independent, which has been running an elephant appeal to raise awareness of the plight of the worlds largest land mammal, write:

While the international ban in 1989 is widely credited with curtailing trade in the West, China is now the largest ivory market in the world and accounts for an estimated 70 per cent of global demand.

While Ivory is still culturally important in China, its scarcity at a time of global economic decline has made it a sensible purchase for those wanting to invest equity and capital. Government attempts to restrict the black market ivory trade in China has resulted in a large hike in price and demand. Furthermore as Chinese companies continue to turn to emerging African markets for foreign infrastructure contracts ivory smuggling will continue to increase.

I would imagine that many reading this article are saddened by the plight of the elephant. I would like to think that many in our party are frustrated by the slow action by the international community and the failings of CITES. Fragmentation of ivory bans, ‘one-off’ historic stock sales and legalised hunting constituted by article II of CITES is responsible for the death of 100 African elephants every day. If current patterns continue the African elephant will be extinct by 2027.

As a party we should call for a reassessment of CITES, to ensure it reaffirms its commitment to a total ban on the sale of ivory. There is much that the UK can do to help Chinese authorities tackle the black market demand, and within the UN the UK can continue to work towards a unilateral ban on the ivory trade. Last week the European Union pledged €12m to help fight the illegal ivory trade across Africa which will go towards preventing further civil conflict which is often funded by the ivory industry. The same funding stream that UKIP Members of the European Parliament want to see abolished, while producing no policy on animal welfare to date.

Liberal Democrats should be the party that works within Europe to build on the work already done. We should be supporting a Pan-African Free Trade area, mentioned in the Coalition Agreement, which will go some way in ending the conflicts that fuel the ivory trade but also will result in the creation of institutions capable of regulating the sale of elephant products. We should also be building on the African Elephant and the Ivory Trade early day motion, making it the basis of Liberal Democrat party policy.

It might not be a vote winner. Many may feel sympathetic but detached. But it is the right thing to do. The industry has clear links with state and non-state terrorism, perpetuates civil conflict and has funded humanitarian catastrophe. Safeguarding the future of the most majestic, attentive animals on earth from the inhumane aspects of humanity should be the mission of this generation, even if its only to indulge the generations to come with the ability to share a world with Grace and her calves.

* Richard Kilpatrick is the Chair of Campaigns for Manchester Withington Liberal Democrats and the Liberal Democrat Council Candidate for Didsbury West, Manchester City Council in May 2018.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Richard Kilpatrick 3rd Jan '14 - 2:06pm

    Thanks Suzanne. You are right the UK has strong feelings about animal welfare. My point was that in the coming two years animal welfare will not be on the agenda. That is a shame because the endagered animal of this world are going to be the victims of a panicking world market. I actually think Party policy is not strong enough, we may even need to look at a policy on non-ethical produce and animal welfare seperate to existing policy papers.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter 28th Feb - 3:32pm
    @Joseph Bourke - I'm afraid you make many sweeping claims that confuse weather with climate, rhetoric with reality and ideological scare mongering with scientific fact....
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 28th Feb - 3:28pm
    Let's LEAD on policy for once, as you ask, Sue, and let's have the joined-up thinking Nigel Jones keeps on requesting. Nigel is right, INEQUALITY...
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 28th Feb - 2:58pm
    This was the usual mixed bag, 2 brilliant results, 1 above average & 3 moderately bad. If you are thinking that we only stood in...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 28th Feb - 2:48pm
    Rob, you argue that Liberalism and liberal democracy is facing an existential threat – globally. You begin with worrying about anti-Greta who almost no one...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 28th Feb - 2:48pm
    Ben Rich, I regard our 2019 GE campaign as an aberration because wiser heads in our party, notably Tim Farron and Vince Cable, advised both...
  • User AvatarJeff 28th Feb - 2:46pm
    Thomas 28th Feb '20 - 1:54am: By the way, the UK controlled its own monetary policy, unlike Greece. While a member of the EU we...