Opinion: If Cameron won’t attend Rio+20 then Clegg should

The Rio ‘Earth’ Summit in 1992 was the “world’s biggest ever political gathering” with 108 heads of state or government. Its successes and failures on the environment and development continue to shape those debates.

In June, Rio de Janeiro will host the UN Conference on Sustainable Development, a.k.a. Rio+20. A very early draft document suggests it will cover a wide range of topics, including access to food, water and energy; marine litter and pollution; eliminating “market distorting and environmentally harmful subsidies […] including those on fossil fuels, agriculture and fisheries” (I’ll believe it when I see it); strengthening the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and even the idea of an “Ombudsperson for Future Generations”. A set of “Sustainable Development Goals” may guide policies worldwide from 2015 to 2030.

While global warming and, indirectly, ocean acidification tend to hog the stage – even within our party – we also face many other forms of pollution, unprecedented extinction rates, harmful changes in land use, and the huge challenge of meeting the resource demands of an ever-growing and increasingly prosperous global population. Despite this, and calls from the Environmental Audit Committee and NGOs, and the summit having been postponed so as not to clash with the Queen’s jubilee, it has been reported that the PM is not intending to attend.

Why, if that proves true, should Nick Clegg not lead the delegation? Should any policy-making actually be necessary, he seems better qualified than Cameron. He once wrote a postgraduate thesis on “The Deep Green Movement and its Political Philosophy” and, more pertinently, co-wrote a paper in 2001 that discussed strengthening environmental agreements, their links to the WTO, and UNEP (all in the 2010 manifesto too).

But, admittedly, he hasn’t hugged any huskies.

His repertoire of languages would certainly serve him well and it would be good to have someone *ahem* who can build alliances with leaders from Europe and elsewhere. Do we really want Caroline Spelman as the UK’s highest representative, there to set a precedent and show the UK’s commitment to these issues? Low expectations of concrete action aren’t a reason to avoid involvement: they’re reason to strive harder.

I want Liberal Democrats – including Chris Huhne or Andrew George perhaps – there (and working in the run-up) to push for ambitious measures and internationalism; fighting poverty and ensuring markets account for externalities. The presence and input of the Deputy Prime Minister, however, would significantly raise the profile of these issues. What’s more, it would help establish that this is the greenest government ever, and that we are the greenest party of government ever.

* Adam Corlett is an economic analyst and Lib Dem member

Read more by or more about , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTony Greaves 11th Aug - 10:06pm
    Well said, Clemmy. The Government's approach is quite shameful.
  • User AvatarBrian Ellis 11th Aug - 9:50pm
    An excellent article. I have voted. But I have to say that some of the comments made by supporters of both candidates caused me some...
  • User AvatarPeter j bodiam 11th Aug - 8:54pm
    if we built houses for rent and then charged a percentage of a person's income as the rent then if a person was out of...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 11th Aug - 8:42pm
    @ Michael BG " The party after 1918 was very anti-socialist,............. Not that surprising given nearly forty one time radical Liberal MP's joined the Labour...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 11th Aug - 8:40pm
    It's interesting to wonder where most Lib Dems fit in the freedom vs. equality debate. Clive Lewis, the Labour MP who gave the recent Beveridge...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 11th Aug - 8:22pm
    @ Michael BG It might have been all so very different if ............ The Liberal mine owners and shopkeepers of Lanarkshire had adopted a former...