Stephen Williams MP has recently brought forward a motion about extending the franchise to 16 and 17 year olds: this means that the House of Commons will debate the issue on 24th January. In 2005 his motion on the topic failed by just 8 votes. As such, it’s exceedingly important that as many MPs who support votes at 16 attend the debate and vote if possible.
Liberal Youth Scotland has been strongly pushing for votes at 16 for all referendums and elections this year, starting with our Freshers’ Week postcards. In light of the fact that the SNP must now deliver on the commitment, agreed by Liberal Democrat Secretary of State for Scotland Michael Moore, to give 16 and 17 year olds the right to vote in the independence referendum, the argument that they are not mature enough to make important political decisions does not hold. If they can help decide about an issue of such importance as Scotland’s future, they should be able to participate in all other referendums and elections as well.
Currently, 16 and 17 year olds in the UK can marry, leave school, get a job and pay taxes as well as join the armed forces. When young people contribute to society in so many ways, we believe it’s imperative that they are granted the right to vote so they can represent their views at the ballot box and take part fully in the democratic process. Extending the franchise means younger voters are given the opportunity to represent their own issues, instead of relying on older voters to do it for them.
Liberal Youth Scotland, with the help of Liberal Youth, are calling on members, activists and supporters of Votes at 16 all across the country to help raise the profile of this debate by getting in touch with MPs to ask for their support. We hope the independence referendum has been the catalyst to ensuring Votes at 16 becomes a priority for the government. Please help us to open up the debate by signing our petition, lobbying MPs on Twitter and Facebook or use our letter template on the LYS website to contact your MP to ask for their support.
* Hannah Bettsworth is an Executive Member and Jenny Marr is Vice-President Communications of Liberal Youth Scotland
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Can Burnham deliver on housing?
Meeting Planting Up Sunniside
Argent: Hold Your Head Up
Why do different species have a different lifespan (two potential reasons)
David Murray
Michael Cole
John Reed
Colin Brown
cim
3 Comments
There is a flaw in the argument here, in that the promise by the Scottish Parliament to extend the vote to 16/17 year -olds in the Scottish referendum doesn’t prove anything about their maturity. It just shows that for whatever reasons, Scotland is willing to give it a try. So let’s not base our decision on false premises. I am in agreement about giving younger people the vote, but not on the grounds of their maturity and most certainly not on the grounds that most of them have an adequate knowledge of the world to make a sensible decision. Having been a teacher for more than 40 years I can assure you that most 16 year- olds are lamentably ignorant. However, that is not the point. In a democracy we give individuals the vote not on the basis of their intelligence, maturity or interest, but as a human right.
“Currently, 16 and 17 year olds in the UK can marry, leave school, get a job and pay taxes as well as join the armed forces.”
What happens to this argument when the school-leaving age rises to 18, though?
I don’t have a strong opinion either way about the age at which young people should be allowed to vote. What I do have a strong opinion on is that , whatever age is decided, be it 14, 16 or 18 the age should be consistent for everything. hannah and Jenny make the point that ‘currently, 16 and 17 year olds in the UK can marry, leave school, get a job and pay taxes as well as join the armed forces.’ Those same young people cannot buy a drink in a bar until they are 18. Surely for consistency and sheer logic the age, whatever it is, should apply to everything.