A good conference rally is fun to attend and tricky to report on, simply because there should be nothing new. The audience ideally leaves reminded of the key messages and enthused to fight the good fight – there’s plenty of time for controversy over the rest of the weekend.
As in Bournemouth, the rally took on a glitzy feel: dry ice, bright lights, (relatively) slick presentation.
Lorely Burt opened procedings with a few jokes, and promise of holding her seat in Solihull, where the Lib Dems overturned a 9,400 Tory majority last time round.
Then a selection of parliamentary candidates entered from stage right, each with a worthy policy vignette, some delivered better than others, and, of course, carefully chosen to present a good gender and ethnic mix.
Next came a big hitter – and they don’t come much bigger than Paddy Ashdown. Most politicians would shy away from using the word “existential” at any time, never mind in the first minute of a speech.
Not Paddy, who treated such conventions with the distain they deserve, as he relaxed with a hand draped across the lectern. He asked which party we should trust to sort out the economic mess, and most people in the hall probably guessed what the answer was going to be.
“You only get Vince Cable if you vote Liberal Democrat”, Paddy told us, to great applause.
He called for new Great Reform Act. Westminster should do far less – power should be handed down to nations and communities.
Shirley Williams – still magnificent after all these years – gave us more gravitas before Tim Farron did the comedy turn he does so well, and enthused everyone for the fight ahead.
Before Nick came on stage, there was the now-traditional mini-movie. This one had an assortment of people saying how rubbish Brown and Cameron are, and how wonderful Nick and the Lib Dems are. The movies are decent enough, but they never quite seem to work for me – not sure why.
Finally, Nick strode manfully onto stage do his stuff (the last few seconds of which even made it onto some of the news bulletins). As per the formula, Nick thanked, and bigged up, the other speakers before giving us some stiring, and suitably uncontroversial, words of his own.
Everyone trooped out, and those of us from Lib Dem Voice optimistically hoped they’d find our fringe event a more attractive option than the bar or dinner.
10 Comments
Do we get Vince Cable? Or do we get Osborne in a yellow tie? And would this be the same Vince Cable that promoted prison privatization and was in charge of some very dodgy goings on at Shell or the Vince Cable that came over all Keynesian-Zen?
Over the last week or so we’ve had Cookites defecting to the Lib Dems and speculation as to whether Robin Cook would join this supposedly “centre-left” party. We’ve had Clegg praising Thatcher as his heroine and saying that he would deal with the deficit with 100% cuts and 0% tax rises. Today he attacks prospective “masochistic” cuts.
What kind of beasty are you? I have no idea.
What kind of beasty are you? I have no idea.
Yes, god forbid that a political party should fail to conform to narrow leftist-rightist distinctions and actually offer a new approach. Shocking. It’s almost as if we’re neither Labour nor the Tories. Oh wait…
It’s the inconsistency. We have anti-cuts rhetoric alongside promises to deal with the deficit wholly through cuts, cutting deeper than either real party is willing to commit to.
It’s not that you don’t fit on the left/right axis- you would if you knew what you stood for.
“It’s not that you don’t fit on the left/right axis- you would if you knew what you stood for.”
Lol. I think you might just have made Catherine’s point for her all over again.
Seriously, what is complicated about “we need to make cuts to reduce the deficit, but making them too quickly will undermine recovery”? I can certainly believe that we haven’t put it across well enough because I’ve only been aware of it myself for a couple of months (and for that matter I’m not sure I personally agree with it) but it seems perfectly coherent to me.
I can’t but feel that people who look for “rhetoric” in favour of any particular position will find it. Every day I read a new excitable piece in a newspaper (you’ve mentioned a few of them) about the latest rhetoric, how it emphasises this, de-emphasises that. That’s what journalists do. And they’re constantly asking the same leading question, just like you are – do you agree more with *this* or with *that*? And of course the answer is always, no, we don’t agree with this. But hang on, no, that doesn’t mean we agree with that either. Now, clearly there’s a political need to not agree too closely with either party – but it’s also just true. From what I know, we don’t precisely agree with either Labour or the Tories’ position on cuts.
Basically you can either set out to believe everything you read in the papers to the letter, or not.
I’m referring to what I’ve heard from Liberal Democrats, all the empty nonsense we’ve heard from Clegg and company. This is a good case in point: http://johnrentoul.independentminds.livejournal.com/312375.html- Pure posturing.
Until the last few days there was no hint that the Lib Dems would be ruling out tax rises in favour of pure cuts in public expenditure. More Thatcher than even the Tories dare.
We arenot ruling out tax rises, for some fairly well-off people; we just balancing them with some tax cuts for some very poor people. If you cant place that on a left/right axis you need a new axis.
Bollocks- are you’re talking about that £17billion cut in public services to fund a mere £1billion of tax cuts for those that creep above the current thresh-hold- the very people who, along with those below the thresh-hold that will gain nothing, rely on public services the most?
It’s either childishless bad policy, or its stated aims are untrue- it does not help the poorest, it strips them of services in order to pay for tax cuts enjoyed by the richest far more than by the poorest.
*childishly bad policy
“We have anti-cuts rhetoric alongside promises to deal with the deficit wholly through cuts, cutting deeper than either real party is willing to commit to.”
Cutting deeper by cancelling a replacement to Trident and the eurofighter, cancelling ID cards, cancelling the child trust fund. Is all that empty rhetoric? The people you call the ‘real’ parties are the ones who won’t tell you what they will do.
Shirley Williams is still magnificent — I fully agree. I sense though that Nick Clegg doesn’t use her as much as the Party should… or could.
One Trackback
[…] Paddy Ashdown in existential shock at rally (Iain Roberts) […]