Pension tax relief for most well off to be cut

News from the Treasury:

The annual allowance for tax-privileged pension saving will be reduced from £255,000 to £50,000, and the lifetime allowance will be reduced from £1.8 million to £1.5 million. This will replace the complex proposal legislated for by the last Government in the Finance Act 2010.

“Tax-privileged” is a tax break to you and me by the way. The governments estimates that in a normal full year these changes will bring in an extra £4 billion and affect around 100,000, four out of five of whom have incomes of over £100,000.

Reducing tax breaks for the most well off has long been Liberal Democrat policy. Good to see the government following in those footsteps.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

9 Comments

  • But the effect of these changes will be that all the remaining defined benefit plans in the Private sector will close. Once senior managers get no benefit from being in them they will shut them down (not nice but human nature). I suspect contribution rates to DC plans will also go down.

    The law of unintended consequences strikes again.

  • @SMcG: What a bizarre post. So we should continue to grant unfair pension tax-perks to the very wealthy because otherwise they will stop supporting the system that benefits them so much? I’ve heard it all now. No doubt Labour will use absurd arguments like that to attack this proposal.

  • @SMcG: I disagree too. In all of the large corporates where I’ve worked the handful of senior execs who would be in a position to make (or benefit from) pension contributions of this magnitude in a single year already sit in their own, separate pension schemes, over and above the DB schemes in place for the vast bulk of the workforce. I do know of a handful of DB schemes still in place in large corporates, though typically these are now on an average rather than final salary basis.

  • Mark Inskip 15th Oct '10 - 1:31pm

    @SmCG
    Nonsense, ‘senior managers’ will still get benefits from defined benefit schemes, just that only the first £50,000 of benefit will be tax free. Close a scheme and they get no benefit.

  • I am trying to describe the world as it is rather than as we would like it to be.

    There are still a fair number of DB plans open to future accrual while being closed to new members, although I agree some of them are now on a career average basis rather than final salary. The lifetime cap is now lower so many more people will get caught by that.

    @Dominic – I am not sure you are right I think they may have higher accrual rates or be able to take their pension without reduction at a younger age rather than being in a separate plan. Even if they are in a separate plan which they have to close down I strongly suspect that they would take the opportunity to cut the main plan as well.

    @mark – you havent understood how the new rules affects DB plans.

  • Nonconformistradical 15th Oct '10 - 3:59pm

    “The lifetime cap is now lower so many more people will get caught by that.”

    @SmCG

    So how much might someone be putting away in a pension scheme over a 40-year career to end up with a fund of £1.5 million on retirement?

  • @SMcG It depends what you mean by senior managers. In most organisation, those with the power to make decisions over whether the employee schemes continue are at board level, and have separate director pensions.

    £50K a year in pension contributions is a LOT of money to put into your pension BTW. Most people with contributory schemes would be putting more like £5K in a year, including their employer’s contribution.

  • @nonconformist – you don’t get it.I am not saying anything about the justice of these proposals I am trying to explain the reality of what the effect will be
    @mrs b I don’t think this is the case. Where they get a better pension it is better provision as part of the same scheme.
    50k is a lot of money but that is not really the point.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • theakes
    Yes but this is an "Internal poll" allegedly, not neutral! It might be right but it comes with a lot of caveats does it not?....
  • Peter Martin
    @ John, “What about some of Jezza’s wilder promises from December 2019”. I'm not sure which you are referring to but if it is the pledge ...
  • expats
    Andy Daer 15th Jun '21 - 5:58pm..............Israel’s predicament echoes Apartheid South Africa’s in only one respect; world opinion has suddenly turned aga...
  • Barry Lofty
    If the good citizens of Chesham and Amersham do decide to vote against the incumbent Conservative party for whatever reason it would be a welcome, if very surpr...
  • Laurence Cox
    @John Marriott WHY? What is magic about your 5% threshold; and when it doesn't work will you then say a 10% threshold will make everything right? Assertion i...