PMQs: Cancel that firing squad!

We started yesterday with warm congraulations to Her Majesty on attaining the sixtieth anniversary of her accession to the throne.

For the second week running at Prime Minister’s Questions, Ed Miliband’s inquiries were on health reform. He had one of his most successful sessions so far, during which we found out that David Cameron doesn’t want Andrew Lansley to be taken out and shot.

Miliband was on excellent form and, by golly by gosh, at one point he almost ascended to the John Smith “hotels fall into the sea” level of stinging wit, with this passage:

Isn’t this interesting? The Prime Minister says that this is all about reform, but even the Tory Reform Group has come out against these proposals. It comes to something when even the Tories do not trust the Tories on the NHS.

It sounded better than it looks written on the page.

There were hordes of traded statistics. Cameron held his ground well. But I can’t help but think that the government is battening down the hatches and preparing to sail on through flak and storms to get the Health and Social Care Bill, come what may, on goat skin to the Diamond Monarch for her signature.

Liberal Democrat questions

Sir Menzies Campbell asked what confidence we can have that unilateral intervention by Russia will put an end to the terrible violence in Syria. “Very little” – was the PM’s response.

Gordon Birtwistle highlighted the success of the Work programme since it was introduced in Burnley in October 2010. The town has gone from 66% of people economically active to 75% in that time.

Unusual event of the week

Nick Clegg nodded. He only does that once every blue moon these days. On this occasion it was to indicate his support for the sovereign. Safe nodding territory there.

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist and member of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in PMQs.
Advert

2 Comments

  • •Nik Darlington….

    I love your conclusion that, an article that starts…”For the good of the NHS, Andrew Lansley must admit defeat”, and ends..,.”For the good of the NHS, Andrew Lansley must admit defeat and head to the backbenches”….
    is pro reform.

    The idea that the paragraph..
    .”We ought not consider the NHS purely in financial terms because the benefits to the nation’s health and well-being must outweigh the mere cost. Yet that is not an argument for it to remain unchallenged or unreformed. The NHS must be continually analysed and rationalised to ensure that it is fit for purpose in the modern world”…..is pro reform, for ideological reasons, would be laughable if it wasn’t so serious…

    The paragraph is “Mom and Apple pie”. No organisation, be it public or private, could argue that it should, “remain unchallenged or unreformed” because that would mean it was considered perfect.

    The article is wholly ‘against’ this NHS reform and that is what matters…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Mick Taylor
    I am very conflicted by this bill. I believe strongly in the right of self determination, but I do worry about unscrupulous people using the right to die for th...
  • Peter Martin
    @ John Hills, "Norway channelled profits from their oil into the Government Pension Fund Global— apparently the largest sovereign wealth fund in the w...
  • Tristan Ward
    Britain's failure to establish a sovereign wealth fund for the proceeds of north sea oil and gas possibly the worst decision taken by government in my lifetime....
  • John Hills
    Very interesting and made me think about the contrasts with Norway where their citizens do seem to more directly benefit from their oil reserves. Norway channe...
  • Peter Davies
    In England outside London, we are about to move to a system of unitary authorities at least the size of five authorities. That means that most constituencies wi...