The simple tweet “F*ck” at 10am with the reply “Agreed” last Friday was the only source and all the evidence I required to know that Chris Huhne had been charged. Two words tied emotion with cognition. I followed Nick Clegg’s tax cut speech live through the medium of 140 character paraphrase: a sort of Focus-speak reduction I can only imagine would have the speech-writers crying. The utterance “Borgen – Danish West Wing” was all the persuasion necessary to watch it religiously.
Twitter is free, fast and tragic. And if it wasn’t powerful in facilitating the fall of dictators or mindless riots, governments wouldn’t consider using its censorship option. 39 of our 57 Lib Dem MPs use it and our party president Tim Farron assures me he can help us to improve on that. But should they bother with any new technology that isn’t proven to add value? Retweeting ICM polls from an iPhone won’t improve our electoral fortunes (but keep trying anyway). If our MPs want to replace paper with iPads perhaps they should buy their own and truly embrace CONNECT.
We can’t waste precious campaign time, every second invested should increase our returns at the ballot box. The more tangible gift to our residents in the form of a 4 foot pile of literature provides us with greater reassurance than online banter, assuming something more positive happened on the way to the round filing cabinet recycling box.
You can use social media to add value, through following or leading – to engage people as Julian Huppert does. He tests opinion through tweeting polls to his audience, such as “what do you want me to ask at PMQs?” and it delivers spot on results. That third-party testimonial is a ready-made Focus vox-pop.
Councillor Jamie Matthews represents students and aptly chooses to challenge poor internet service provision on their behalf over Twitter. Councillor Victor Chamberlain also regularly uses it to report back on his ward activities. We’re all probably familiar with “20 is plenty” speed reduction campaigns, yet there’s something motivating about watching the action unfold, leaving a digital campaign trail, from council chamber motion to action photo. This helps to spread best-practice activity among other campaigners.
We repeatedly ask “what’s new?” of our friends, family and now, followers. Irrelevant, old information just isn’t worth sharing. We merge communicating with the people closest to us with less deserving online strangers. Like-minded individuals are drawn to one another through statements, photos and web links.
Loosely-affiliated groups form around shared opinions, oppose other groups and do constant battle. Some win at the expense of another, opinions become exhausted, or expire to give birth to others. Groups disband and regroup, gaining some people formerly on the opposing side of another issue.
Whether using it as a blunt broadcast instrument, to shape debate through persuasion or gather intelligence, you alone are not going to make the country a better place through it. But your individual participation may help build the team to get us there.
* Alan Muhammed is Liberal Reform Co-Chair & works as a Management Consultant. He is a former Guildford Borough Councillor & Lib Dem HQ Campaigns Staffer.
3 Comments
Twitter can be fun for political banter, condensed gossip and exchanging views with senior politicians or commentators. But there is a far more constructive, pro-active side to it as a campaigning tool, whether it’s a matter of whipping up support for an e-petition or summoning like-minded people to take part in a demonstration. As a journalist and academic focussing mainly on the Arab world, I have found Twitter invaluable as a source of raw news from the frontline of the Arab Spring, from the Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions through to the current carnage in Syria. One is therefore able to disseminate stories more quickly and authentically and it is an added bonus that one can ‘retweet’ other people’s best offerings and links.
With large numbers of MPs now on Twitter, campaigners should make sure that they are following and hoping to get followed. MPs, by the nature of the work they do, have a short concentration window and glancing through Twitter to see what is happening is always easier than ploughing through lengthy reports.
Interesting to see these complementary perspectives: Jonathan Fryer mentions it as a pro-active tool for whipping support i.e. for petitions, or as I’ve seen Evan Harris do – urge people to attend key conference votes en-mass, as well as being a more raw, front-line source of news.
As Sue Doughty points out concerning value to MPs – concise comments are easier to glance through than lengthy reports, meaning they are better informed of public opinion and the key facts that matter to the people. Then, in terms of on-the-ground campaigning, it can be a way to acquire deliverers or for residents to ask for ways to get involved, even if it’s as low commitment as requesting a window poster – which we witnessed during Cleggmania in 2010.