PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on impending Winter of Discontent

Nick Clegg used his two questions to the Prime Minister today to challenge Gordon Brown on what used to be his strong suit: the economy. What Nick has done repeatedly at PMQs , and to increasingly good effect, is to link Big Issues back to everyday concerns, today focusing on energy and food prices, and starting with a punchy line straight from the Book of Vince:

The Prime Minister promised to abolish boom and bust, but now we have got both: inflation is booming, the economy is bust.

I’m not alone in being impressed by Nick: The Spectator’s Fraser Nelson, not always the greatest friend to the Lib Dems, scored today’s PMQs as a victory for Nick. Fraser also acutely picks out a flaw in the Prime Minister’s lazy responses:

Brown was, as always, caught between his two responses on the economy. Response A is “it’s bad out there, your Great Helmsman will guide you through the storms.” And then there’s Response B, “I’m a great Prime Minister, things are really good here, record employment, lower inflation than anywhere in the world.” Unwisely, he chose Response B … Brown is tiptoeing closer and closer to Callaghan “crisis? What crisis?” territory.

As for David Cameron, it was as ever a fluent, often witty routine, aided by one of the poorest, most incoherent performances I’ve seen by a politician at the despatch box – that Gordon Brown is Prime Minister would astonish an impartial observer watching his ducking, clunking, stuttering replies today.

And yet Mr Cameron does insist on ruining it. A couple of weeks ago I expressed the (clearly naive) hope that the Tory leader was learning to “[moderate] his performance, attempting to tone down the shrill posturing and cheap jibes which have all too often marred his superior debating skills”. Not today. Twice he referred casually and pettily to the Prime Minister as “useless”. Whether you agree or not, I expect more serious behaviour from the man who wants to present himself as the next elected Prime Minister. Mr Cameron is doing himself no long-term good with such easy union-hack retorts.

Anyway, you can judge for yourselves below, via YouTube and Hansard:

Mr. Nick Clegg (Sheffield, Hallam) (LD): The Prime Minister promised to abolish boom and bust, but now we have got both: inflation is booming, the economy is bust. Energy prices are rocketing, house prices are collapsing, thousands of jobs are on the line, and food prices just go up and up every week. When will the Prime Minister accept that a winter of discontent is just around the corner?

The Prime Minister: I do not know whether the right hon. Gentleman has seen the employment figures today, but employment in this country is at its highest level ever. There are 61,000 more jobs in the economy during the last three months, and while, yes, there are problems, we have inflation that is lower than the rest of Europe and lower than America, we are taking action to take people through these difficult circumstances, which the previous Conservative Government never did when there were problems, and at the same time we are creating more jobs in this economy and we have the flexibility to enable us to withstand events. I would have thought that he would see the economy in its proper context.

Mr. Clegg: The Prime Minister is so out of touch he does not understand the scale of the problem: 5.5 million British families are in fuel poverty and all he can squeeze out of the energy companies is 26p per week for each of those families; 1.7 million people on low incomes are still waiting for a decent home, and his only feeble response is to buy up fewer than 1,500 empty properties. He is tinkering at the edges, obsessed with details. Will he take a summer break, take a step back, see the big picture and come up with real answers to prevent a winter of misery for millions of British families?

The Prime Minister: The big picture is taking action to help hard-pressed families. When the right hon. Gentleman talks about fuel poverty, he omits to mention the winter allowance paid to 11 million pensioners in this country and costing over £2 billion. When he talks about the utility companies, he is omitting to tell us that there is £100 million to help low-income families, and he fails to mention that 22 million families will receive £120 in a tax cut over the next few months. All these things are necessary to help people through difficult times, but I think that people would prefer our solutions to the problem than his.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Advert

3 Comments

  • There is an interesting picture emerging about the difference to which liberals, non-affiliated and those on the right or left of the spectrum are rating the exchanges (using the PoliticsHome index as aa principle source).

    It appears clear that Clegg is making a strong liberal case which is being disregarded by non-liberals as less prescient.

    So either Clegg is ahead of the game and will benefit from his approach over the long run or the public will recognise him as veering off on tangents and down blind alleys and make him unlikely to last out the year (guess which I think is closer to the truth).

    The challenge is whether he can successfully merge the interests of the so-called social liberals and economic liberals while maintaining the balance of the internal party dynamic. All in all we ought to be cautiously optimistic, and less cautious about it as time passes.

  • “…veering off on tangents and down blind alleys and make him unlikely to last out the year…”

    No, that’s the other guy!

  • To be honest, I thought it was an ok performance. He has done better. Though it was tricky, as Cameron put on a blinding display.

    The hardest challenge is getting past the determination of the press to define everything in terms of left and right, and to help people understand what we stand for, without pandering to that.

    So my mind, social liberalism and economic liberalism go naturally hand in hand and are equally counter-dependent on each other.

    While there are a few whining party nutters, the challenge is really an external one of marketing and communication, rather than internal struggle. Well… it should be, anyway.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Jane Ann Liston
    Well said, Wendy - good advice....
  • Michael 1
    I don't think people should be members of legislative bodies ex officio such as mayors. But there is an argument to have a body like the US senate of around 100...
  • David Raw
    @ Jeff, "The abhorrent treatment of those Windrush arrivals is another argument against ID Cards. Once you require a licence to live from the state, you are no ...
  • Jeff
    Matt Wardman 30th Jul '21 - 1:42pm: There’s also the separate question about whether ID cards may in fact be sensible. Would the Windrush Generatio...
  • Joe Bourke
    I see William Keegan, an economics editor at the Guardian, is urging Labour to adopt a policy of reversing Brexit https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/jul/...