Iain Roberts

Policing expenses a snip at £10,000 per MP

By | Thu 11th February 2010 - 7:28 am

Radio 4’s Today Programme has revealed the cost of the new parliamentary body to police MPs’ expenses: around £6.5 million a year, with 80 staff and a boss pulling in £100k.

Nice work if you can get it, but surely it raises serious questions about the new system.

The total amount current and former MPs are being asked to repay, covering claims over several years, is a touch over a million pounds.

That means the new cost of checking those expenses and ruling whether they’re legitimate is many times higher than the amount the public purse was previously losing where MPs played the system, pushed their luck and – in a handful of cases – allegedly indulged in outright fraud.

In recent years, every MP has – controversially – been allocated £10,000 annually to communicate with their constituents. That allowance is now gone, and it seems the money – all of it – will instead be spent on checking claims against receipts.

Is that really the most efficient system that could be devised?

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Liberal Eye 11th Feb '10 - 6:40pm

    The new system is deeply offensive and reflects terribly on our political leadership – in all parties I’m afraid without exception. It’s an epic piece of bad governance.

    It betrays an utter disregard for costs or, to put it another way, for taxpayers’ hard earned money. It is a panic reaction to the whole scandal, a “something must be done” answer that plays the public for fools. With this sort of epic waste going on right inside Parliament government can have no moral authority whatsoever when it comes to asking the nation to tighten its collective belt in the face of depression.

    Can someone please start a new political party to actually represent the public interest.

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Matt Wardman
    I think a key question is the capability of Local Government, in its starved-for-20-years state, to deliver. It is currently well on the way to being a gutted c...
  • David Warren
    @David Raw I don't agree with the draconian laws introduced by the Thatcher government that allow union funds to be seized and campaigned vigorously against ...
  • Roland
    @Peter Martin - " but it does raise the question of why there is so little UK involvement in the sector." ...
  • David Raw
    @ David Warren You write approvingly, "we also need to highlight reforms that are needed to make unions truly democratic. The Tories passed legislation in the ...
  • David Warren
    I have been a trade union member since 1980 and for 20 years was a full time representative of the postal workers union CWU. Yes Liberals do need to relate m...