Iain Roberts

Policing expenses a snip at £10,000 per MP

By | Thu 11th February 2010 - 7:28 am

Radio 4’s Today Programme has revealed the cost of the new parliamentary body to police MPs’ expenses: around £6.5 million a year, with 80 staff and a boss pulling in £100k.

Nice work if you can get it, but surely it raises serious questions about the new system.

The total amount current and former MPs are being asked to repay, covering claims over several years, is a touch over a million pounds.

That means the new cost of checking those expenses and ruling whether they’re legitimate is many times higher than the amount the public purse was previously losing where MPs played the system, pushed their luck and – in a handful of cases – allegedly indulged in outright fraud.

In recent years, every MP has – controversially – been allocated £10,000 annually to communicate with their constituents. That allowance is now gone, and it seems the money – all of it – will instead be spent on checking claims against receipts.

Is that really the most efficient system that could be devised?

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Liberal Eye 11th Feb '10 - 6:40pm

    The new system is deeply offensive and reflects terribly on our political leadership – in all parties I’m afraid without exception. It’s an epic piece of bad governance.

    It betrays an utter disregard for costs or, to put it another way, for taxpayers’ hard earned money. It is a panic reaction to the whole scandal, a “something must be done” answer that plays the public for fools. With this sort of epic waste going on right inside Parliament government can have no moral authority whatsoever when it comes to asking the nation to tighten its collective belt in the face of depression.

    Can someone please start a new political party to actually represent the public interest.

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Le Grice
    @Ynys Mon Man Try telling that to all the hard working candidates and activists in the many target wards where the Greens beat us with a paper candidate!...
  • Ynys Mon Man
    The Lib Dems are highly visible in roughly a third of Lincoln and perhaps 50% of York (both Labour-held at Westminster). Why is this? Because a small core of ac...
  • John McHugo
    @Simon McGrath - "It started with 6 Arab countries invading Israel intent on killing its Jewish population". That is just simply untrue and an outrageous st...
  • David Allen
    Here (including below-the-line comments) are some answers to the "invisibility" question: https://www.libdemvoice.org/roz-savage-mp-writes-liberalism-is-havi...
  • David Allen
    @cim, Largely agree. Having an agenda which people will rally behind must come first. Yes, the Right will always claim that LD plans are fantasy economic...