Preparing for the AV referendum: standing more local election candidates

The connection between standing local election candidates and the AV referendum may not seem obvious at first, so imagine this scenario…

It’s quite likely that the referendum will be held on the same day as local elections, such as the May 2011 local elections.

The arguments over electoral reform will attract to the ballot box some people who don’t usually vote in local elections. If the pro-AV campaign goes well (and it starts with a lead) many of those people will be well disposed towards Nick Clegg and the Liberal Democrats.

And what will they find when they get handed another ballot paper, this one for the local elections?

If the answer is no Liberal Democrat candidates, that will immediately send them a strong message about how the party isn’t a serious party around their way. That may not be a fair view all the time, but it’s the obvious one to take.

Not only is it the obvious one to take, it’s one that many people do take and do feel very strongly about. During my time working for the party, there was voluminous and strongly expressed feedback each spring via the party’s online channels as people expressed their disappointment / disgust at turning up to vote and finding no Liberal Democrat candidate on the ballot paper. Cue complaints about party not being serious, having let them down, not being worth supporting in the future and so on.

It’s a problem when local and general elections are combined – and I’ve a strong hunch that missing local election candidates often cost us votes in that Westminster constituency because we’ve sent people such a negative message about ourselves just before they mark the ballot paper. But at least in those circumstances there is a Liberal Democrat on the other ballot paper that the person is given (Speaker’s constituency etc excepted).

There won’t be that safety net in England in May 2011. (In Scotland and Wales we’ll be there on the devolved ballot papers, but there won’t be local elections).

The problem is more than just likely lost votes or certain damaged credibility – it also puts people off offering to help.

The solution?

Put up more local election candidates.

Finding people and putting together the paperwork takes time. It can be tough, but where we really put our minds to it it is often possible to put up far more candidates than we’ve done for a long time previously – witness the success in putting up more candidates to challenge the BNP this May.

So if your local party has council elections next year, why not start your planning now? You can even plan to start collecting signatures for nomination papers from 1st December when the new electoral register comes out. You’ll have to watch out for people who subsequently drop off the register, but having to make up some gaps in your lists of 10 signatures in March is much better than starting with a completely empty slate in March.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • Very good point Mark. Most councils up next year are likely to need between 1 & 3 candidates per ward. Struggling local parties shouldn’t find it too hard to have at least one approved candidate per ward (see new English party rules on approval of candidates) so everyone can vote see a Lib Dem on a ballot paper even if they can’t field a full slate.

  • On a linked issue – would it be possible/allowed/worthwhile to register a description with the Electoral Commission so that local election candidates for that election appeared as “Liberal Democrats – YES to Fair Votes” or similar?

  • Also on that point – I hope everyone’s joined the fair votes purple movement
    They’ve had a great reception in the media and their high profile activities will ensure that the issue is made familiar to the electorate in a positive light.

    As we move along the line towards the referendum, the briefing against AV (or whatever system…) will become fierce and we’ll need to fight hard to keep the YES message up there with the rest. Let’s not forget that, whatever they say now, neither Labour nor the Tories want anything to do with electoral reform. Turkeys don’t vote for Christmas.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Brad Barrows
    It’s a pity this article combines an attack on voter ID requirements with a critique of the failings of FPTP. While almost everyone reading this site will bel...
  • John Marriott
    @Peter Martin My answer to your question is “The Federal Republic of Germany”. I’d even go as far as accepting a President; but I know that this cherry o...
  • John Marriott
    Joe Bourke’s reference to the Canadian Tax system reminds me of the three years my wife and I spent working in Alberta back in the early 1970s. Calculating yo...
  • Nonconformistradical
    "If voter impersonation were significant there would be many cases of voters turning up to be told they had already voted. Also there would likely be many cases...
  • Andrew Tampion
    George Thomas is right to say that it is bizarre to argue that because there is no evidence of current voter fraud that is not a reason to improve the security ...