
(Hat-tip http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/).
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
What’s going on with party strategy? (Caron Lindsay)
-
We do have a two-tier system (Neil Hickman)
-
Observations of an Expat: NATO Irony (Tom Arms)
-
What really happened? (Simon Banks)
-
Why community politics matters (Mark Corner)
Recent Comments
Tom Arms
I meant to say that the UK supplies the nuclear warheads for its deterrent....
Tom Arms
There are some areas where the US is likely to dominate for a very long time. Space is an obvious one. Ukraine would be up the proverbial creek without America'...
Ruth Bright
@Paul is surely right, do we have age breakdowns for stats on members and active supporters?...
Tom Bailey
Alex Macfie says: "He [Farage], has just seized on one case of supposed “anti-white bias” by the police (the only one available)" So the 3 decades of Brit...
Alex Macfie
@Simon Robinson &c: Please stop pretending Nigel Farage is acting in good faith. He has just seized on one case of supposed "anti-white bias" by the police ...



4 Comments
Less open to a witty title but just as telling are the graphs on the following page:
http://michaelandlaura.org.uk/~michael/blog/index.php?id=577
(short url for twitter: http://bit.ly/a1xqQN )
When is the mass demonstration?
The above illustration is the best example I have seen so far of the injustice to the voters in our present system of electoral voting, so glaring in fact, it hurts to look at…
An inquiry falls far short of justice for the people who were turned away from the polling stations, and the cost of £5000 per person to challenge this in the courts is an insulting slap in the face to the electorate, where is our collective outrage?
If any person can afford the cost to challenge in the courts and they lose, they also lose the £5000 and the system gains that money, if they win they get the money back with no gain except the judgment in their favor, it’s just not right, they should stand to gain if they win the same as the court would stand to gain if they lost…
I think this graphic is actually rather poor at showing the problem. The blue and red circles look about the same size. Only the figures reveal that there is about a 10% difference in each case.
@Paul – Circles are bad at clearly illustrating and difference in simple values, which is one of the reasons they’re used time and time again in the Tory manifesto.
New Rule – if you wish to illustrate proportion use pie charts, if you wish to illustrate change over time use bar charts or line graphs. Only use ‘circle graphs’ if you’re in the business of trying to mislead or confuse people.
Nuts to the circles. Pie chart or it didn’t happen.