Proposition 8: The Editorial and the Musical

LDV has previously mentioned California’s vote to ban gay marriage. The New Yorker has an article (one I find unduly rude towards Mormons’ own history in making its point), suggesting Prop 8 will be the last stand for homophobia in the USA:

Like a polluted swamp, anti-gay bigotry is likely to get thicker and more toxic as it dries up… This sort of sludge may or may not prove to be of some slight utility in the 2012 Republican primaries, but it is, increasingly, history … “We believe all families matter and we do not believe in discrimination,” Barb Young said. “Therefore, our family will vote against Prop 8.” It wasn’t enough this time. But the time is coming.

Meanwhile, less seriously, a group of comedians and performers have provided their own musical, interpreting the voters’ choice.

See more Jack Black videos at Funny or Die
Read more by .
This entry was posted in Humour and LDVUSA.
Advert

4 Comments

  • I rather like this video too:

    http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/cca5e8a78a/protect-marriage-protect-children-prohibit-divorce-from-jonathan-smith

    A campaign to ban heterosexual divorce to protect families.

  • Which part of the bit about the Mormon’s history do you take issue with?

    Joseph Smith did have 27-odd wives, some were underage (by modern standards) and the Mormon movement is, even today, polygamist in some parts of Utah.

    It is also (one of many) conservative influences on Ameria and deserves to be called as such.

  • Richard Huzzey 5th Dec '08 - 6:59pm

    I thought someone would ask that!

    I don’t dispute their facts, but I feel that it’s cheap and petty to use it to make an argument against the CLS’s modern social teaching. You can throw errors 100 years ago against any sect or religion.

    For me, it detracted from a piece that was otherwise well argued.

  • I find it funny that anyone would even bring up Mormon Polygamy in this discussion. Since the federal goverment stripped Mormons of their religious marriage rights. Whats good for the goose is good for the Ganders.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Evans 24th May - 10:41pm
    John (Marriott), Yes I do like getting my hands dirty. And have done regularly. I do want us to be part of a Government again....
  • User AvatarMichael BG 24th May - 10:06pm
    Joseph, It is really good to read that you support that basic rates of benefit should be increased to the poverty level as defined by...
  • User AvatarDavid Chadwick 24th May - 9:05pm
    Thank you Bernard. I studied in Den Haag for three years and several of my friends are active within D66. They’re a well-organised, friendly bunch.
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 24th May - 8:58pm
    @ Joseph Bourke And unlike you, Joe, I believe what they all have/had in common was that they could have paid a lot more income...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 24th May - 8:44pm
    David Raw. I don't know how you come up with these little snippets like Danny Alexander's tweets and the strategic importance of Gibraltar's Barbary Apes...
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 24th May - 8:19pm
    If the Lib Dems were acting in the national interest by forming a coalition with Conservatives in 2010 then why were the Conservatives not also...