The Queen’s Speech: move along folks, not much to see here

This week sees the fourth Queen’s Speech of this Coalition Government, but no-one’s expecting it to be especially busy or radical.

(You can hear me discuss some of the reasons why on Radio 4’s PM programme here.)

To some extent, Lib Dems will breathe a sigh of relief: missing from it will be any reference to the Communications Data Bill, already torpedoed by Nick Clegg. Indeed, the Speech seems to have been stripped of those bits of legislation which looked set to cause the Coalition leaders most aggro for least reward. While Lib Dem pressure saw off the ‘snoopers’ charter’, both minimum alcohol pricing and plain cigarette packing (measures likely to annoy the more free-market / libertarian elements in both parties, but especially the Tories) have also bitten the dust.

What’s left appears pretty unambitious. That’s not to say there aren’t big things within it. To name just three…

  1. Steve Webb’s Pensions Bill will introduce the single-tier pension, ensuring that people on low and average wages will be able to maintain their standard of living in retirement.
  2. Jo Swinson’s Consumer Rights Bill aims to give consumers greater confidence in knowing their rights when they purchase new products, switch suppliers or make purchases via the internet or phone.
  3. And Norman Baker will be championing massive spending on the high-speed rail network, HS2 (I still think it’s a huge white elephant, but it seems pretty popular within the Lib Dems).

But this remains a pared-down programme. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing. As Mark Pack points out here, a loaded legislative agenda isn’t a guarantee of good government; the government needs to deliver on reforms already underway before initiating new ones and over-reaching.

However, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion the Coalition is now pretty much intellectually dead. Whereas the Coalition Agreement fizzed with radical promise — both parties alighting on the bits of their manifestos they thought most important and parking the bits they’d always found a bit embarrassing — we’ve now reached a point, it seems, of mid-term, stalemated exhaustion. Before you know it the party conferences will be upon us, along with the growing realisation the next election is looming.

The Coalition gives every appearance now of biding its time, wanting to stick around for another two years not because it’s buzzing with new ideas, but because it has its fingers crossed that the economy is going to up-tick just enough by 2015 to save Lib Dem and Tory necks. That may be our best and only strategy, but it doesn’t half make those early radical days feel like ancient history.

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from 2007 to 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Isn’t it only the third under the coalition? I thought there wasn’t one in 2011.

  • David Evans 7th May '13 - 6:44am

    I tend to agree with the drift of the article, but comments like “the Coalition Agreement fizzed with radical promise …”, and “those early radical days ,,, ” do seem to trying to put a positive gloss on our naivety in the negotiations. The disaster of the referendum on AV and the failure to deliver lords reform showed that it wasn’t an agreement at all, but a document designed to save David Cameron’s skin and put a deeply reactionary party in power, with a minimal nod in the direction of the smaller party’s agenda.

    It gave the Conservatives the only thing they ever want, power, and it gave our leader the feeling of being something important in government. Nothing more, nothing less.

  • Paul In Twickenham 7th May '13 - 8:14am

    But surely the Tories are already gearing up for 2015?

    In the last few days they have responded to the UKIP surge by promising an EU referendum if they win a majority in 2015, and in the budget Osborne introduced his ridiculous Help To Buy scheme which will drive up house prices by 30% (as reported in the press yesterday) with that increase in nominal prices peaking just in time for the election, just the tonic needed to make the tory core vote feel like they’re rich. I have no doubt that there are other plans in the pipeline.

    And how are the Lib Dems responding? Mr. Clegg’s electoral strategy appears to be “decimation, not oblivion”.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to           show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • John Grout
    I have to say I agree with James B, Phil, Jennie and Charley here. Having heard how wonderful it was in the old Liberal Party back in the day from Michael, J...
  • Brad Barrows
    Putting this in context, I’m sure low paid council workers who are getting 1% pay increases would be delighted to receive a 3.1% pay increase. How about a few...
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Lorenzo Cherin "However, Italy, France, Germany, Japan, all have licences, as art of a mix, of funding in some of them, so perhaps I should not say, few ." ...
  • Andrew Tampion
    I agree with this article. But for me there can be no freedom of speech without the right to cause offence. Brad Barrow is right with his example of abortion....
  • Jennie (she/her)
    I do find it interesting that there are so many in our party who think that asking someone if they adhere to basic Liberal principles like "everybody should hav...