Mark Pack

Rejoice! 11 months (and 1 new government) on and the Home Office responds

By | Sat 14th August 2010 - 9:20 am

Long term readers may recall my concerns over how the approach the Independent Safeguarding Authority was taking to the Vetting and Baring scheme, and in particular the way its guidance suggested that it didn’t really treat being found innocent in a court as counting as being innocent.

The ISA passed the issue on to the Home Office, and – as I previously reported – then there was silence, despite prompts from me. Silence too reigned when I contacted my Labour MP, Jeremy Corbyn, three times about the matter. Between them they didn’t even reply the once.

The ISA had the good grace to be embarrassed by this, and did respond (and in a positive way about the parts of the issue within their remit).

But post-election, and with a new ministerial team in place at the Home Office, I thought I’d try once again. And you know what? Bingo, a prompt and detailed reply – and one that lays out a position very different (and much better) from the one in the original guidance that I’d started off commenting on. With revised guidance being produced, it looks as if my original concerns are all being covered.

Good news.

Oh, and what was at the bottom of the reply? That original email from me to the Home Office which had gone unanswered for so long but clearly had safely reached them. Amazing what a change in ministers can do…

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Big Tall Tim
    Excellent stuff Ed. Very well said...
  • Simon Robinson
    @Roland. Yes strictly speaking you are correct that it's the individual who chooses to view high taxes as a disincentive. But realistically, the vast majority o...
  • Richard Treadwell
    Do you think we need to spell out how we'll pay for our expensive tax cuts and defence investment? Surely, rejoining the single market/customs union (valuable a...
  • David Raw
    "David Chadwick launches bid to be Welsh Lib Dem Leader"..................... how can he 'launch a bid ' when he is the only qualified candidate ?...
  • Mick Taylor
    @Tristan Ward. I do think that we do need higher tax rates than we have for the very rich and some way of taxing wealth, probably through land or property taxat...