Remembering Robert Woodthorpe-Browne MBE – notes from Liberal International Congress

Anyone who has been active within the liberal family in the UK, Europe or internationally would know of and remember Robert Woodthorpe-Browne MBE

As I write this blog from the 64th Congress of Liberal International in Santiago, Chile, I cannot help but think of him.  Were he still with us today, he would most certainly be at Congress, networking in Spanish like a local (just as he was as fluent in French and German), knowledgeable, affable and quintessentially internationalist.

The theme of this Congress was the Future of Freedom, apposite for this time in history, as we encounter the rise of populism in Europe and America, and escalating conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East.  Indeed, this theme was explored in a round table discussion expertly led by Lord John Alderdice, on the Future of Liberalism.  I would like to share a few nuggets that I took away from the discussions.

Informed by history and philosophical thinkers such as Isaiah Berlin, John called on Liberals to seek a more thoughtful way forward.  What do we mean by freedom and liberty, he asked?  It could be negatively defined as freedom from oppression, or positively, as the freedom of choice, the ability to do what one chooses without fear or retribution.

John mentioned 3 important points:
1. We may be individuals, but we also exist through relationships, and we must consider the individual’s place in their community.
2. We assume that people have rational cognitive faculties, but we are also emotional beings who more often think emotionally.
3. Science itself is developing, complex systems engage with each other, opening up new possibilities.

Following the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, there was an initial euphoria that liberal democracy had prevailed.   We have however since realised that that was not to be.  Instead, we have found ourselves in a world that is far more complex.  There was a need to recognize “plurality of values” and liberalism has to be relevant to the lives of ordinary people. 

As liberals our responsibility is to stay true to our roots, whilst at the same time, to be open to new ideas and tolerant of those with views which are different from ours.  John made reference to Ed Shapiro’s book “Finding a Place to Stand” (2020), encouraging self-reflection and asking the question even of those whom we disagree with (e.g. Trump): “What are they right about?”


Liberalism may be a great philosophy, but we also need to find ways of applying it at times of war (whether a hot war or in cyber-space) or under regimes that do not tolerate dissent.  Activities outside an autocratic regime may adversely impact the lives and freedom of relatives and compatriots still living in the system.  And there is the challenge that many may be willing to trade freedom for material or other needs.  Meanwhile, the impact of science and innovation may lead to unforeseen consequences (eg Heisenberg and the Manhattan Project). 

This brings me back to Robert as one of his last and possibly most impactful legacies was the founding of the Paddy Ashdown Forum thinktank (“PAF”) with systems thinker and practitioner, Chris Gleadle.  PAF is one of 12 thinktanks which are members of Liberal International and Lord Alderdice agreed earlier this year to be our Patron along with Lady Jane Ashdown. 

I am both humbled and proud (if it is possible to feel those conflicting sentiments at the same time) to carry on Robert’s legacy on the board of the Paddy Ashdown Policy and Research Forum (parent not-for-profit company of PAF). 

Thank you and RIP Robert.  We will always remember you.  

 

* Merlene was co-founder of Chinese Liberal Democrats and on the executive of the LibDems Overseas. She co-edited “Rise of China – Fresh Insights and Observations” published by the Paddy Ashdown Forum (2021)

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

4 Comments

  • As liberals our responsibility is to stay true to our roots, whilst at the same time, to be open to new ideas and tolerant of those with views which are different from ours. John made reference to Ed Shapiro’s book “Finding a Place to Stand” (2020), encouraging self-reflection and asking the question even of those whom we disagree with (e.g. Trump): “What are they right about?”

    This sums it all up for me.

    Worth the read, Merlene.

  • Paul Reynolds 5th Dec '24 - 3:40pm

    Thank you Merlene, for helping us remember Robert Woodthorpe Browne. A remarkable man of endless energy and good humour, who did more than anyone to quietly bring the liberal-democratic parties within ALDE in Europe and Liberal International globally, together. His extraordinary linguistic skills and detailed knowledge of political systems in ‘member countries’, enabled Robert to further diplomacy among diverse nations, with quiet professionalism. He is still sorely missed. I recall my first ALDE Congress many years ago where we had a labyrinthine UK Group meeting to discuss the extensive list of lengthy policy motions for voting, and our potential amendments vs rival amendments. Having been in international politics for 30 years, I still found Robert’s grasp of detail and line-by-line compromise proposals absolutely jaw-dropping. Even when the number of UK LD delegates became smaller after 2015, the UK still seemed to have the most influence on European liberal policy, and Robert’s genius underpinned that. My thoughts are with Robert’s family. We are grateful for your tolerance of his lng absences !! Warmest wishes to all.

  • Paul Reynolds 5th Dec '24 - 4:27pm

    I was interested in your reference to Lord John Alderdice’s talk, on the Future of Liberalism. In the UK and the US liberalism seems increasingly conflated with social democracy (especially in its Tawneyist incarnation), when in some respects they are diametrically opposed. The way ‘freedom’ is conceived today has contributed to this conflation and created existetial political problems for liberalism; ie in equating freedom with chaos some ‘liberals’ have created common ground with Straussian neo-conservatism. Allowing te concept of freedom to be equated with inequality and exessive individualism, has served to separate community & liberty, to the detrimebt of localism and decentralisation, weakening opposition to an overbearing centralisd state.

  • Merlene Emerson 5th Dec '24 - 10:34pm

    Thank you @Elizabeth for your helpful comment. It was so good to meet you in Santiago and I hope to have the opportunity to visit you in Kenya one day.
    Thanks @Paul for your warm and thoughtful tribute to the late Robert W-B, and insightful views on the future of liberalism. We missed your attendance this year – but hope you won’t be staying away for long!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • John Mc
    This is all good stuff, but honestly, who is really getting to hear it? Reform have 5 MPs yet seem to be being anointed as a government in waiting. The LDs hav...
  • Simon R
    @David Evans: Are you seriously trying to compare maintaining the level of the pension at its current level in real terms (which is what would be implied by scr...
  • David Evans
    Hi Simon (R), I do have difficulty in understanding how you can make such a post and justify it by the one reason, "That doesn’t seem to me like something to ...
  • David Raw
    As someone of a certain generation whose Party slogan was "People matter, People Count", I've nothing to add to the BBC News today : "As Palestinians pou...
  • Simon R
    @Cassie: Why do you feel that talk about ending the triple lock should make pensioners worry? Ending the triple lock doesn't mean anything silly or mean like en...