Rennie: Opposition must be broader than narrow Tory agenda

Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie says that opposition to the SNP at Holyrood must be on a range of issues far broader than a narrow Tory agenda. For a start, I’d suggest, neither Tories nor SNP are known for their commitment to civil liberties. The absence of a commitment to fight the Tories’ Snoopers’ Charter in the SNP manifesto is significant. Before you say “that’s Westminster”, note that the manifesto talked a lot about Trident. It’s notable that when SNP MPs had a chance to kill off the Snoopers’ Charter a few weeks ago, they bailed.

Since the election Ruth Davidson has highlighted a limited range of issues as her priorities for the new parliament.

Willie said:

Of course the issues that the Conservatives have highlighted are important. But opposition to the SNP needs to be far wider than a narrow Tory agenda.

On issues like tax there is more that unites the Tories with the SNP than divides them. And on issues like justice they are more likely to chase cheap headlines than push for reforms which help cut offending and reduce the number of Scots who are imprisoned. On education there is no indication that they will press for the urgent investment that is required to make our schools the best again.

Scotland is an open, tolerant, liberal minded country and the Liberal Democrats will provide a strong liberal voice at Holyrood.

The election provides the Liberal Democrats in Scotland with clear space on civil liberties and on using the powers of the Parliament. The SNP has been been elected to govern in the most powerful devolved Parliament in the world. They are very timid about using those powers. It’s like giving them a run in a Ferrari that they’ll never get out of second gear. It’s up to us to present a radical, bold alternative and deliver proper opposition like we did in the last Parliament. The group with the best record at forcing policy change was the 5-strong Liberal Democrats.

The Parliament is now dominated by the two most well-funded dominant parties across the UK. They both need effective opposition. We’d better step up.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • John Mitchell 10th May '16 - 7:08pm

    There certainly is a distinct voice lacking in terms of standing up for civil liberties and I know that the Liberal Democrats will defend these liberties as the party did in the last parliament.

    As Gareth says though, our muted acceptance to the Named Person legislation is disappointing.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Diana Simpson
    You would have a problem of public transport capacity to cope with kids going home in the rush hour(s) rather than before it. Our local buses are missed out whi...
  • Chloe
    "We did use RON in single-winner STV / AV elections at my Students Union. But I’m not sure I see it as constructive practical politics" That's where it sho...
  • Chloe
    Richard; Who picks up the tab for the net fiscal deficit of the Scottish & Welsh governments . Jana is correct - ultimate sovereignty is with Westminster. ...
  • George Thomas
    I think there are some issues which should unite Welsh politicians across the spectrum: - retrospective compensation for lack of devolution of HS2 funding; ...
  • Matt (Bristol)
    cim - I could see a situation where in a multi-winner STV election, if NOTA or RON (reopen nominations) would remain in contention but with a special threshold ...