Report shows how extensively this country fails vulnerable children

Yesterday the UK’s Children’s Commissioners published a joint report to the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. It makes very grim reading. If a child is poor, bullied, suffers mental ill health, gets involved with the criminal or immigration systems or suffers the effects of domestic violence, this country simply does not provide them with what they need. I seriously recommend that you read the whole thing because a few headlines from the press doesn’t quite give the flavour of the extent to which we should be ashamed of ourselves.

We can have all the arguments we like about austerity measures and to what extent they were necessary but this report provides an extensive list of the sorts of problems that we liberals should be putting all our energies into solving. Top of my list would be access to justice and reversing the cuts to legal aid that prevent children being properly represented in cases that affect them. Second would be mental health. The range of things that affect young people’s mental health is huge and we need to look at prevention as well as treatment when things do go wrong.

Some solutions don’t actually cost that much. The provision of decent quality sex education which considers the realities like the effect of the internet and consent issues is so obvious that only a government stuffed with social conservatives who are wedded to notions of a blissful past that never existed could deny. That’s unfortunate, then.

It is very clear that austerity has really affected children’s day to day lives badly. Liberal Democrats can rightly be proud of putting extra money to help disadvantaged kids in school, but those kids often went home to poor housing and not enough food. It’s difficult to fulfil your potential in those circumstances. Now that the economy is on a more secure footing, these issues need to be urgently addressed. Instead, the Conservatives want to shrink the state and its safety net even further.

Scottish Liberal Democrat Justice Spokesperson Alison McInnes was already acting on one thing that the Commissioners highlighted  – the low age of criminal responsibility in this country. In Scotland, it’s technically 8 and she is trying to get it raised by tabling amendments to a new Criminal Justice Bill.

There is one other issue the report raised. The commissioners recommend a total ban on corporal punishment of children. It takes up a small paragraph in a 51 page report, but almost the entirety of the Telegraph’s article on it. Funny that. Anyone might think they were trying to get their readers up in arms about these lefty commissioners rather than look at the massively serious issues they raise. I have long thought thought that such a ban was necessary. It seems bizarre that children don’t have the same protection in law that adults have from violence. If I were to hit Tim Farron or Norman Lamb, I’d rightly end up in big trouble. If I were to hit a toddler in my care, the law would allow that. I think the law needs to send out a clear message that hitting children is never acceptable. So I asked Tim Farron and Norman Lamb what they thought – and they both favour a ban on smacking:

I think that Liberal Democrats already have good ideas to tackle most of the issues raised in the report. We need to think about how we can talk about the plight of our children so that people demand action  from an unwilling government. 

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • Don’t worry Caron. Ian Duncan Smith will just re-define what constitutes the “Rights of the Child” and everything will be fine…

  • Strange, the report seems to make no mention of the systematic abuse of vulnerable children on an industrial scale in Rotherham,Rochdale, Oxford, etc.and the attempted cover up.

    Great to talk about the rights of children, but if children cannot be protected from criminals due to possible ethnic sensitivities, what’s the point of it ?

  • Tony Dawson 2nd Jul '15 - 8:27pm

    What Caron Said. And Kevin, too.

  • A Social Liberal 3rd Jul '15 - 1:16am

    Sorry Kevin, I don’t buy it. Are there ‘possible ethnic sensitivities’ when not protecting young people from paedophiile Roman Catholic priests, or certain public schools, or white middle aged men on the internet?

    Paedophiles are paedophiles no matter their religion, ethnicity or standing in the community. Pointing out the authorities failures in one area whilst ignoring others – wilfully or not – is not on.

  • Caron Lindsay Caron Lindsay 3rd Jul '15 - 7:56am

    Actually, Kevin, it does cover it – as I say, I’d recommend reading the whole thing.

  • Mick Taylor 3rd Jul '15 - 9:52am

    The biggest problem is the attitude to child abuse. I have found, on the doorsteps, that many people do know about abuse, but won’t report it because ‘you don’t shop people to the police’

    Of course, even if abuse is reported there’s no guarantee that the police will take it seriously or act on it.

  • David Warren 3rd Jul '15 - 10:32am

    All children are potentially vulnerable.

    We currently fail as a country in the area of child protection in a variety of ways.

    A police announcement recently that they haven’t got the resources to pursue what they describe as ‘low level’ paedophiles sums it up for me.

  • One area where children are often open to exploitation and abuse is if they go missing from the care of local councils.

    Caroline Pidgeon has done some excellent work on this this.

    Her latest report is well worth looking at:

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Mary Fulton
    I think there is a liberal case to be made for genuine defence spending but not for spending on offensive capability. In other words, the UK does not need armed...
  • Mick Taylor
    There is never a case for more arms spending.If we spent a quarter the amount we spend on arms promoting peace and getting would be combatants round a table tal...
  • Jenny Barnes
    It's probably time we were less aligned with the US. Their interests are not necessarily ours. Not suggesting we should leave NATO, just be a bit more pragm...
  • David Evans
    Sadly Kyle, I think your post is based on inexperience rather than any objective analysis of the situation. While in most general elections there are a few ou...
  • John Waller
    Patrick Cockburn wrote on December 2: ‘The Gaza conflict has become a giant war crime. Israel says that it is responding to the Hamas attack on 7 October whi...