Riddell me Clegg

The most recent issue of Liberator magazine mentioned the comments made recently by a senior Lib Dem MP that he felt the party suffered from a ‘Peter Riddell problem’ – that the Lib Dem leadership appears at times desperate to earn the praise of The Times’s senior political commentator, and arch civil servant manque, as a ‘government in waiting’. And in the process the party loses its radical edge and drops its most popular policies.

It’s interesting, then, to read today’s analysis by Mr Riddell of Nick Clegg’s leadership and Lib Dem fortunes ahead of the party’s spring conference in Harrogate. Here’s some highlights:

On the polls

a two-party squeeze has only partly happened. The Lib Dems’ poll ratings fluctuate from month to month and vary between pollsters, partly reflecting differences in the ways the polls are conducted. But, if anything, the Lib Dems have crept up to the higher teens as Labour has slipped back and the Tories have not yet returned to their highs of last summer.

On the prospect of BNP electoral gains

Mr Clegg accepts that extreme, nationalist and xenophobic parties often do well in times of economic trouble, searching for scapegoats and playing an anti-Establishment card. He believes that the Lib Dems can position themselves by showing that they can deliver on the ground in local councils and by taking on the BNP, as they recently did successfully in a street-by-street battle in a council by-election in Newcastle upon Tyne.

And on how the Lib Dems can gain

Mr Clegg wants to break ranks with the Establishment. The Lib Dems can only gain from being bold, as they have sought to be on taxes, welfare and schools. Similarly, now, Mr Clegg has raised the fresh issue of whether directors of failed banks, including non-executives, should be disqualified. It is not just narrow populism for taxpayers to demand that such directors face some reckoning because of their serious errors. Mr Clegg is correct that mainstream politicians need to respond to such anger.

So there we have it. If Peter Riddell is saying “The Lib Dems can only gain from being bold”, then the party has no excuse to play it safe in the coming months.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Possibly stupid? 6th Mar '09 - 11:11pm

    Who is Peter Riddell?

  • Cheeky manqué.

  • Matthew Huntbach 7th Mar '09 - 10:57am

    The problem is that when right-wing commentators urge the Liberal Democrats to “be bold” they often mean “become much more right wing”. They are very selective on what they will call “bold”.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Anthony Acton
    I agree with Graham. The party has had two opportunities to get on equal terms with Labour and the Tories this century. The first, in 2010, was wrecked by the d...
  • cim
    @Peter Davies I'm not talking about young people in general, though - according to the polls, 10% of younger voters support the Lib Dems, same as any other age...
  • PM
    @Tom, You're not the only one who's suffered from writers block when it comes to describing the recent social unrest in France and other EU countries. No-one...
  • Kevin Hawkins
    Here is my usual monthly summary of the last fifty local by-elections. It does not include the by-election on the 5th November as I like to give summarise at m...
  • Peter Davies
    @cim You are massively over-generalising about young people. The proportion that believe we were wrong to declare war against Germany in 1939 is tiny. So is the...