Sal Brinton on the change of attitude needed so that disabled people can start to live their lives

Sal Brinton was part of the House of Lords Committee which produced today’s report which reviewed the impact of the Equality Act 2010 on disabled people. Its conclusions were pretty damning. It’s worth setting out in full the five major themes that they identified:

First, in planning services and buildings, despite the fact that for twenty years the law has required anticipatory reasonable adjustment, the needs of disabled people still tend to be an afterthought. It is time to reverse this. We are all living longer, and medical advances are keeping us alive where in earlier years it would have failed to do so, but not necessarily in good health. We should from the outset plan for the inevitability of disability in everyone as they get older, as well as for those who suffer accidents and for all those other disabled people who are the subject of our inquiry.

Our second theme, closely related to the first, is the need to be proactive, rather than reactive or process driven. Many of those involved—Government departments, local authorities, the NHS, schools, courts, businesses, all of us—wait for problems to arise before, at best, attempting to remedy them. We should be planning so that disabled people can as far as possible avoid facing the problems in the first place.

Thirdly, there is the issue of communication. So many of the problems of disabled people are exacerbated by a failure to make them aware of their rights in a manner that is clear and is adapted to their needs. But communication is a two-way process. If all those responding to the needs of disabled people engaged with them, listened to them, and took account of their views, all would benefit.

Rights which are unenforceable are not worth having. The law and the courts must adapt so that rights can be made effective as easily, quickly and cheaply as possible.

Lastly, it is the Government that bears ultimate responsibility for disabled people, and it must be structured to discharge that responsibility. Currently it is not.

Sal was on the Today programme talking about the report and its conclusions this morning. You can listen to her here from around 1 hour 13 minutes. She focused a lot on issues relating to transport. It’s worth reminding ourselves of the article she wrote for us back in 2014 about how disabled rail travellers were “treated like packages.” Some of the incidents she outlined were appalling:

Last Sunday, returning from the Scottish Lib Dem Conference in Aberdeen, I was left on an empty train on an empty platform at midnight at King’s Cross for over 15 minutes before I spotted someone on the first floor, and waved furiously to get her attention;

On Today, Sal said that despite legislation being in place for two decades, it hasn’t been properly enforced. Buses still haven’t complied with accessibility requirements and it is virtually impossible out of Central London to hail a cab that’s capable of taking a wheelchair. She highlighted how the initial planning for Crossrail had 7 stations without step-free access.

She highlighted how Witness after witness demonstrated to the Committee how not enforcing the law had a major impact on their life, adding that most of the report’s 55 recommendations are no or low cost but implementing them requires organisations to be proactive.

The recommendations are highly specific. One of the most interesting was that the Committee disagreed with David Buxton, who had been giving evidence in his role as Director of Campaigns and Communications of the British Deaf Association. In their opinion, the Equality Act did cover BSL

Mr Buxton told us that “the Equality Act does not cover BSL users” and “does not cover BSL use”.242 Our conclusion is otherwise. The Equality Act covers BSL users because it imposes on service providers a legal obligation to make reasonable adjustments in communicating with them; and where BSL is their first or only language, those adjustments will very often be the provision of BSL interpreters. Without the Equality Act and, before it, the Disability Discrimination Act, there would be no such legal obligation.

Sal concluded today that:

All it takes is the political will so that disabled people can start to live their lives.

That’s quite a powerful statement – and quite an indictment on our institutions of Government for not making more progress over he last 20 years. How do we take the recommendations forward in a way that actually transforms the lives of disabled people? As a party which seeks to break down barriers for people, we should be at the forefront of that effort in our own practices as well as in our campaigns.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Op-eds.


  • Lorenzo Cherin 24th Mar '16 - 3:07pm

    This is of the usual high standard we have come to expect and get from Sal Brinton, anyone briefing against her better understand she is one of the best people to have emerged , and in middle age , in years! And here , as ever, she talks from compassion and that which she brings to the table more than many , her own personal journey. Long may she reign over us , well ,be President , at least !

  • Jayne Mansfield 25th Mar '16 - 12:10pm

    @ Sal,
    I’m not sure that it is within the gift of politicians to change attitudes. They can change laws but that is not the same thing.

    Thirty years or so ago, I and others were sent into the community in wheelchairs. When we experienced the difficulty in negotiating pavements, entering buildings etc., without the help of the person who had been designated our ‘carer’, it was an enormous shock. I considered myself a fairly empathetic person , but nothing could have prepared me or others for the thoughtless, avoidable barriers that undermined our desire for independence.

    It wasn’t just the physical environment either. We all as a group experienced the same phenomenon of shop keepers etc., talking over our heads, ( literally), and addressing our ‘carers’ rather than responding to us.

    A few years ago, a young man in a wheelchair , plus carer, helped me find my way from the Science Museum to Woolwich Arsenal. His ability to change trains etc, unaided was patchy. I felt the same anger that I had felt all those years

    I really think that everyone, schoolchildren, workers etc., should have workshop days where they really experience what it is like to have a disability. My experience changed me from being sympathetic to people with disabilities to someone who felt real anger, a powerful stimulus when one is arguing for change. More individuals should be given the opportunity to benefit from the experience.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Chris Moore
    Mick, our record at holding by-elections in the current political generation, i.e. last 25 years, has been distorted by the wipe out in 2015, at which point we ...
  • Mick Taylor
    I reject emphatically the idea that Corbyn was as toxic for Labour as militant. He actually did quite well in 2017 and only started doing badly when the entire ...
  • Mick Taylor
    @Roger Billins. I was 12 when the Liberals won Orpington and helped with the campaign. Eric held the seat for 8 years and then lost it in the disastrous electio...
  • John Marriott
    @David Raw Thanks for thinking of me. I’ve been on a bit of a self imposed sabbatical from LDV, which looks like being permanent. I think I’ve ruffled too ...
  • Tristan Ward
    @Paul Barker "everyone is running down the Solid Labour win in Wakefield" Seems about right to me: 12.75 % compared to our 30% swing 39% turnout (be...