Sarah Ludford MEP writes… Emergency Motion 6 will promote Schedule 7 reform and protect civil liberties

The last time I wrote a piece for Lib Dem Voice I asked for the assistance of conference voting reps to ensure that party conference debates the detention of David Miranda and the reform of Schedule 7 of the Terrorism 2000 – Labour legislation – under which he was detained.

A very big thank you to those who responded with support for Emergency Motion 6: Schedule 7 of Terrorism Act 2000 to be in the ballot for debate in Glasgow next Wednesday (Sep 18th from 9:00 to 10.30, item F38). I’m sure the handsome volume of signatures – due to the wonderful Caron Lindsay going the extra mile to upload my article promptly on LDV – helped persuade Conference Committee to select it!

This emergency motion calls for the reform of Schedule 7 to ensure it is used solely in cases of terrorism and to strengthen legal safeguards in relation to its use. You will recall that last month Schedule 7 was used to detain David Miranda, the partner of Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, for questioning in circumstances which raise at least the strongest of doubts about the proper application of this most draconian of police powers.

Whatever intelligence interests may have been affected by the Edward Snowden whistleblowing and Guardian publication of NSA documents – and they might have some validity – surely this was a matter for the Official Secrets Act, not for a measure meant to ascertain ‘involvement in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism’. I’m glad to say that @terrorwatchdog David Anderson QC – Alex Carlile’s successor as Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation  – is preparing a short report on whether Schedule 7 was ‘lawfully, appropriately and humanely used’.

The motion does not have space to cover the media freedom and state surveillance issues which form the context for this possible abuse of counter-terrorism measures. But in any case, Sch 7 bears examination entirely in its own right because of the concerns of discriminatory impact it has raised over many years.

There are already some reform proposals on Schedule 7 in draft legislation going through Westminster, but further safeguards are justified. Given the obdurate stance of the Conservative Home Secretary, Liberal Democrat Ministers need the full backing of party conference to strengthen their hand going into coalition negotiations on junking the worst of Labour’s illiberal legacy.

Please stand up for civil liberties and vote for Emergency Motion 6: Schedule 7 of Terrorism Act 2000 in the emergency motions ballot.

Ballot papers will be published in Sunday’s Conference Daily, and should be returned to the ballot box in the auditorium between 09.00 and 13.00 on Sunday 15th September

* Sarah Ludford is a Liberal Democrat member of the House of Lords and was MEP for London from 1999-2014.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • John Grout
    This is a good start, but the sooner Ed corrects his statement about the Supreme Court judgement himself, the better. Hopefully he'll take the opportunity to do...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Mark, The rail network was only in private hands for the privatisation of British Rail in 1994 up until 2001. The Hatfield crash, which was blamed squarely...
  • Jennie
    Thank you, CJ. And thanks for the EDM too (and to every other MP who has signed it)...
  • Jenny Barnes
    David Evans “In workplaces and services that are open to the public: – trans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women’s facilities...
  • Mark
    Mick Taylor states that British Rail had an "enviable safety record." The idea that the railways were safer in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s or 1980s than they are...