Sheffield Labour drops Lib Dem policy of extra pay for the lowest paid

The Sheffield Star reports:

SHEFFIELD’S ruling Labour councillors have been attacked by Nick Clegg for ‘dropping’ a policy to give the authority’s lowest-paid staff an extra £250 each year.

The payment was made for staff paid below £21,000-a-year, under the old Lib Dem administration’s budget for 2011/12 – and Mr Clegg said it was supposed to happen on an annual basis.

But papers setting out the council’s financial plans for 2011/12 – including cuts of at least £48 million – do not include a pay rise next year.

Mr Clegg said: “I’ve had meetings with some of the country’s leading trade union representatives, who recognised that Sheffield was the only big council in the UK to provide the £250 payment – and that it was what they wanted.

“I think they will be horrified to hear that the new Labour council is dropping the commitment to help some of the lowest paid, when they are taking money from reserves to pay for extra spending elsewhere.


Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • It’s funny that only half of the article has been added to Lib Dem Voice. Maybe that’s because its the only part of the article that they like?

    For balance, please read what ithe article goes on to say…

    “This approach was discussed with the old Lib Dem leader, Coun Paul Scriven, and agreed to be taken forward. A collective agreement on this was achieved with the Trade Unions, which was explicit that the payment would apply for the 2011/12 period only.”

    So hardly Labour cutting a payment. The Council and Trade Union’s agreed whilst the Lib Dems ran the Council that it would be for 1 year only.

    This story is no more than spin in the pure desperation of a return to power.

  • @Dave, what you don’t say is that quote was from the Labour leader of the council and not part of the journalist’s own interpretation. The article also doesn’t actually quote Paul Scriven, not has it given him a ‘right of reply’ to the claims made by Labour. The unions may have accepted that the payment was only for the 2011/12 period, but the intentions of the Lib Dem Council appear to have been to continue the payment in future budgets.

    If you’re going to accuse someone of “spin”, at least make sure you’re not spinning in return…

  • Kirsten de Keyser 28th Jun '11 - 10:40am

    Well, they have to have some spare cash for their olympic ticket allocation

  • Just to confirm, it was agreed as an annual increase and is in black and white within the budget book. Labour councillors in Sheffield have no evidence what so ever that this was agreed by the previous Council Leader, mainly because the claim is totally untrue!

  • Leekliberal 30th Jun '11 - 7:22pm

    Labour increased the gap between rich and poor over their 13 years and created a vast beaurocracy to adminster it. They are at it again. How about that Labour trolls!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSean Hagan 19th Jan - 8:41am
    Very sorry to hear this sad news. Due to his good natured and mild mannered approach, lesser people sometimes underestimated Bob Maclennan - but he...
  • User AvatarMartin 19th Jan - 8:34am
    Where, other than a speculation in the New Statesman, does a list of 5 candidates come from? I am not sure it is even possible...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 19th Jan - 7:03am
    Ian Bailey If there is a definable “working class” any more most of the people who would be in it either don’t categorise themselves thus...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 19th Jan - 1:08am
    Gordon, you've got to have a structure on which to base a free-ranging discussion. Somebody had to start off the thinking that led to Policy...
  • User Avatarnigel hunter 19th Jan - 12:33am
    Did the period from 2006 onwards have new editors at the Mail etc.? If so they started a campaign agin us Just a theory but...
  • User AvatarTim13 18th Jan - 11:29pm
    In particular we need to look at 2010, and the run-up to it, so we understand what not to do. We need to absorb the...