Labour splits three ways in Parliamentary vote on carbon budget

Labour MPs yesterday split three ways in a Commons vote on one of the government’s key environmental proposals

The committee vote came in the House of Commons on the statutory instrument (SI) for the fourth carbon budget, on whether or not to accept to accept the Committee on Climate Change’s recommendations that total emissions in 2023-27 should be set at 1950 MtCO2 (a 50% reduction from 1990 levels).

Labour MPs Dennis Skinner and Geoffrey Robinson voted against, Nic Dakin and Ian Mearns abstained and the other Labour MPs voted in favour, as did all the Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs.

Aside from the oddity of the three-way split, the vote also shows once again how even on topics where Labour official policy is in line with the Liberal Democrats, it is Conservative parliamentarians (even if only reluctantly following coalition agreements) who are regularly a more reliable source of support than Labour ones. As on electoral reform, the progressives in Labour are frequently very thin on the ground.

Read more by or more about , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • OK, so Labour has four MPs who rebelled in two different ways. Seriously, there are good reasons to be disapproving of Labour (such as their continued authoritarian line on DNA retention), but this really isn’t it, and it just looks petty of us to be harping on about such things. We have the odd rebels too, these days.

  • Malcolm Todd 29th Jun '11 - 4:16pm

    Oh, come on. 98% of Labour MPs back our and their party’s policy and you’re calling it a ‘split’, which shows that ‘progressives’ (whatever they are) are ‘thin on the ground’? Tendentious hardly covers it. ‘Desperate’ might be better.

  • Malcolm Todd 30th Jun '11 - 4:28pm

    As Mark’s just pointed out on his site, I misread this: it was a committee vote, so four MPs is more than half of the Labour party’s members involved in that vote. Apologies, Mark.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Charley HastedCharley Hasted
    The line here is 'does this disability hurt the disabled person or the people around them more' imo. Haemophilia, Huntington's, etc unarguably cause more pai...
  • Brad Barrows
    @Martin I claim no great theological knowledge but I always thought the Roman Catholic Church believed that sexual intercourse was sinful unless it was to enab...
  • Tony Vickers
    Setting aside the eugenics argument, the bit I found shocking in Laurence’s piece is this: “ This should be a warning about letting those with money fund re...
  • Peter Kemp
    I still want to know if our candidate Richard Foorde is aware of 'Purple Spaceships over Yatton' 😃 😀 He should understand 😉...
  • Alex Macfie
    Only political nerds will remember the date of a referendum from 6 years ago. Ordinary voters will be basing their decisions on how current government policy af...