“What we have is lessons about sex, but nothing about the consequences of sex” – Shirley Williams

The latest Journal of Liberal History (published by the Liberal Democrat History Group) is a special issue on liberalism and women, including an interview with Shirley Williams. One question looked at what changes in society she thought were still needed when it comes to issues of gender, and this part of her answer caught my eye:

Societal change has to be in two ways. One which has already happened is the move towards flexible working … The second big societal change is to teach children at school about parenthood, certainly in secondary schools. What we have is lessons about sex, but nothing about the consequences of sex – which is a bit silly. Parental responsibilities should be emphasised as part of the conversation about sex. That should include, for example, children having some time in the school year where they spend time looking after children. In  a lot of cases you could get fifth formers to help inter-school for two hours per week so they get to know how demanding young children are. Children take up a colossal amount of time, and grasping that would be a key part of accepting the key roles they would have to play.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

9 Comments

  • CQ – I think parents should tell their kids about parenting.

    What Shirley means is schools Showing kids what it means to look after children.

    Not many families with 15 year olds will have babies and toddlers around, except for friends and relatives kids.

  • Terry Gilbert 9th Apr '09 - 3:53pm

    Good old Shirley! Spot on.

    Incidentally, she is easily our best orator – in her own quiet, unassuming way – if you haven’t voted yet…

    Paddy wasn’t bad, but I suspect his lead in the currnt poll is the result of familiarity and his undoubted other leadership skills (tally ho!), rather than the considered opinion of those who have heard both of them (as I have, many times!) and are weighing up the effectiveness of the oratory.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Mick Taylor
    @KeithCresswell. You could argue that NI is just income tax by another name, except that your NI contributions determine the level of pension you can get. If we...
  • Simon McGrath
    Congratulations on the great work in Watford. But this seems very confused : "The economic consequences of continuing our dependence on petrol and diesel are s...
  • Peter Martin
    @ David Allen, 'You have described an unachievable goal as a “necessary” step.' We had such an economy in the post war period. There's no r...
  • Peter Martin
    The correct question to ask is "how are you going to find the resources?" which often isn't the same as "how are you going to pay for it?" If we want more so...
  • Keith Creswell
    A civilised society should try to improve the lot of its poorer pensioners so on balance I believe the triple lock should be kept. However, the reference to an...