The Independent reports Sir Menzies Campbell’s comments on the decision by the Coalition Government not to join other countries in allowing 10,000 refugees fleeing the Syrian conflict where, let’s not forget, chemical weapons have been used. Sir Menzies was not complimentary, that’s for sure:
It’s unfortunate, to put it as mildly as I possibly can, that we have closed our minds to that possibility when other countries in Europe have taken a much more generous position.
The Independent’s view is that Sir Menzies represents the Liberal Democrat view:
Mr Campbell’s view represents that of many of his colleagues in the Liberal Democrats who would like the Government to take a more hospitable view towards Syrian refugees.
I am not one bit surprised by the Government’s attitude, given that they wouldn’t even let the Syrian husband of a UK citizen friend of mine in this Summer when it looked as though we might be bombing the place. When the Red Cross is talking about 2 million refugees needing help, half of them children, even the Americans and other Europeans taking 10,000 each seems a bit mean. UNICEF had this to say about the plight of babies and children there the other day:
In crowded and unhygienic conditions in refugee camps and settlements, where temperatures can drop as low as minus six degrees, babies are at high risk of diseases such as pneumonia.
“Too many Syrian newborns are spending their crucial first months living in terrible conditions that no child should ever have to experience,” said UNICEF UK’s Jon Sparkes.
“Countless babies are at increased risk of infections, disease and even death and we need to act urgently to reach and protect more children in desperate need.”
Hundreds of thousands of children have missed out on routine immunisations for more than two years and are now vulnerable to diseases like measles and polio. Syria has been hit with its first outbreak of polio in 14 years.
While it’s great that the UK Government is matching donations to UNICEF’s Syria Winter appeal (donate here), surely we should be doing more for people in such desperate need in such horrible conditions.
* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
In which H.G. Wells sets out to fool his future biographers
Yet another mock castle
Tristan Ward
Tim Rogers
Jana
4 Comments
Nigel Farage calls for Syrian refugees to be allowed into UK
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25539843
I wonder what it would take to make this government feel ashamed.
I suspect we’ll see a few LibDem defections to UKIP.
I saw Farage’s comments, though right, as being cynically motivated. UKIP wants to portray immigrants as a burden on the economy. Economic migrants are, in general not a burden, as they are mostly young, fit, motivated, ready to work and are likely to accept that getting a job is their first priority.
Refugees, on the other hand, will include a higher proportion of the sick and the traumatised, and will require more help, which is a better fit with UKIPs narrative.
Of course, Sir Menzies, is quite right; all powerful and rich countries bear some shared responsibility for the sort of disaster that has befallen Syria. We must contribute to helping the victims, and accepting some of them as refugees in our country is one way that we must adopt. They major burden of helping refugees in such crises always falls on the immediate neighbours, often much less well off than the West.
I back the coallition on this one.
The government are doing their bit in providing £500 million in aid. The people who need to do more are Arab Countries such as Saudi Arabia who have loads of money and space.
I would allow a few refugees to come in special circumstances eg Christian minorities fleeing persecution. The Arab spring has been an Arab Autumn for many Christians .