Some better news for Alex Folkes

In November, Cornwall County Councillor Alex Folkes had to suffer the ignominy of the Council’s Chief Executive writing to local youth organisations and schools saying that he was a “serious and enduring” risk to children. As Alex explained at the time this had its origins in his 2006 arrest after a cloned bank card of his had been used by criminals to access indecent images of children online.

In 2006 (and before I became a councillor) I was one of many people who was arrested when credit or debit card details were found which linked the cardholders to a site containing indecent images of children. I have never viewed any such images nor had I ever visited the site or any others like it. I was able to show the police that my card had been cloned at some time in the past and used illegally for various things including a hotel in Brazil. I reported that at the time and my bank refunded the money. Of course I cannot be sure, but that is how I believe my card details came to be linked to the site as it fits the time my card was used fraudulently. When details are stolen on the internet they tend to come in a package and hackers can also have access to your address, email, password, phone, IP address, etc, which can easily be cloned and used by another person to cover their own identity and make it look like the victim of their fraud is the guilty party. The police searched my computer and other electronic devices I owned. Because I had done nothing wrong, and therefore there was no evidence against me, the police did not bring any charges and they told me the matter was closed.

Now he has had proof from the Metropolitan Police that they found nothing on his computers at the time. He wrote to the councillors in his group at the beginning of this week to say that he was going to seek re-entry to the Liberal Democrats and to the group in light of this. The Cornish Guardian has the story:

Mr Folkes has consistently protested his innocence and denied any wrongdoing.The case centres on what Metropolitan Police detectives found when they seized two computers belonging to Mr Folkes.

Mr Folkes says the police have now confirmed, in writing, that they found nothing.His claim increases pressure on Cornwall Council to publish at least some of the detail from its own dealings with the Metropolitan Police – detail which in November led the council to publically label Mr Folkes as “a serious and enduring risk to children.”

The council has so far refused, on legal advice, to disclose any of this detail, and Mr Folkes has repeatedly rejected invitations to discuss it with the Cornish Guardian.No-one from the council has been available to comment on Mr Folkes’ email but further developments are likely early next week when officials return from the New Year holiday.

I spoke to the Cornish Radio station Heart earlier this week and the main point I made was that this sort of thing could happen to any one of us as credit card fraud becomes more prevalent. In fact, someone helped themselves to several hundred pounds of my money at some cashpoint in south east Asia a few years back. It’s something many of us have experienced. In fact, last week’s Sunday Times (£) carried a feature which showed that much of one family’s personal information, which they thought was private, was accessible by hackers in about 15 minutes. Innocent people whose cards have been used by criminals in this way have their lives destroyed and reputations trashed.

This is the text of Alex’s email to his colleagues:

Dear all

I hope you’ve had an enjoyable and relaxing Christmas.I’m emailing to let you know of a particularly happy belated present I received: A response to my data subject access request to the Met Police which includes the categorical statement that no images were found on my computer, meaning I am entirely innocent.

Jeremy and Adam have been round to see this and go through everything this morning and, with Jeremy’s support, I am now contacting the local, regional and national party in order to be readmitted.I hope the group will also vote to readmit me at your next meeting.If any of you wish to view this statement or the other evidence gathered I am very happy to share it with you.

I want to give my heartfelt thanks to all of you who have been in touch to offer your support and help.Over the past three months I have watched as the council and media have systematically destroyed my career and my life.They have never shown any evidence to support their allegations, and refused me access even to the details of the claims being made against me until after they had passed judgement.Since this happened I have been busy gathering the evidence needed to show that I am completely innocent.

When the council’s allegations became public I posted the truth on my blog.Back in 2003 someone got hold of my debit card details and apparently used them fraudulently to access an illegal website displaying indecent images of children.I have never accessed such a site or viewed such material.The police, acting on information that my card had been used, arrested me in 2006.They conducted a full investigation and did not charge me because they found nothing on my computer.Thanks to information received from the Metropolitan Police, my bank, and others, I have once again proven my innocence.

The key points are these:

The Metropolitan Police have confirmed in writing that no images were found on my computer and that I was not charged because of a lack of evidence (the only evidence linking me to the offence was someone using my card and email address) despite the council’s claims that the lack of charge was due to a technicality.

The council said the illegal website was accessed from abroad but refused to give me the date this occurred.I have now received the date my debit card details were used from the Metropolitan Police.My bank records show that I was in the UK at the time and that I withdrew money from a cashpoint in London where I worked.It is therefore impossible for me to be guilty of what the council alleged as I would have had to have been abroad.

My bank has confirmed that my debit card was used fraudulently and that they refunded money to my account as a result.Confusion occurred when the police asked my bank whether any fraud had been reported on my CREDIT card.Not surprisingly, the bank reported (correctly) that none had as it was my debit card details which had been used fraudulently.The police list my debit card number as the one used to access the site, but erroneously labelled it as a credit card, sparking the confusion.Rather than trying to find out the truth, the council suggested the lack of fraudulent activity on my credit card proved I was a liar, despite the fact that fraudulent activity was clearly shown as reported and refunded on my debit card and that the card was used to access the site.

The police investigated two laptops.One was the computer I owned when arrested and the other was an old laptop which I had given to a friend.The council claimed these laptops had been destroyed by the police after the investigation.I have been able to prove, thanks to a statement from the friend, that this was not the case and the second laptop was returned to him after the police investigation had concluded.I was asked if I wanted to apply for my laptop back too, but it was obsolete, I had already purchased a new one and I wanted to put the whole episode behind me as I opted not to do so.

The evidence I have gathered over the past two months proves that I have been telling the truth all along and am entirely innocent.In the meantime, my reputation and my life have been destroyed.Of course the council has to take matters to do with child protection seriously, but when an innocent man is treated in such a way it is self-evident that their procedures are not fit for purpose.If they had given me the time to gather this evidence and prove my innocence instead of leaping to judgement and writing to local schools and organisations labelling me a danger then none of this would have occurred.When the police originally investigated this in 2006 they did not publicise this matter and I did not lose my job.While the experience was traumatic it did not cause me to lose my income or reputation as the council and media’s terrible handling of the allegations has this time round.

I will now be putting all the evidence I have received in the hands of the council and demanding an immediate apology.

Unfortunately, even though I have been proven completely innocent, my life will not be returned to how it was before the council did this to me.I have lost my cabinet job and my career prospects.The council, media outlets and individuals have made statements about me which were wholly false in both fact and implication and which have caused me immense damage.As councillors are not considered to be employees I cannot take the council to a tribunal to get my job or income back.I have no option but to consider action for defamation and I am in discussions with lawyers to do so.

I am particularly grateful to the three Liberal Democrat friends who set up a website which has generated more messages of support and offers of financial assistance to help with legal action.I very much hope that matters will be settled out of court and these offers do not have to be taken up, but they are incredibly kind and mean so much.If you would like to add your support – moral or financial – at www.alexfolkes.org.uk – I would be very grateful.

I look forward to seeing you at County Hall in the New Year.

Yours, Alex

It would be the right thing for Cornwall County Council to admit that they had made a mistake. Often powerful organisations are not quick to admit when they get it wrong, causing further anguish to people. We’ll see what happens when everyone returns to work ager the holidays next week.

In the meantime, messages of support have now been published on Alex’s support website. If the Council does not accept his innocence, he will have to take legal action and will need help from anyone who believes in fairness and natural justice.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

16 Comments

  • Samuel Griffiths 3rd Jan '15 - 3:35pm

    What an absolutely awful thing to happen. Best wishes go out to Alex and anyone else effected by this. It does worry me how often “charged” becomes “guilty” in our society, though when it comes to the protection of children I can’t really see another way. Here is hoping he receives all the support he needs to resume his life.

  • Caron Lindsay Caron Lindsay 3rd Jan '15 - 4:50pm

    But, Samuel, you would surely expect there to be something in the way of evidence before taking drastic action. There is no evidence that Alex has done anything wrong, here.

  • Samuel Griffiths 3rd Jan '15 - 5:18pm

    I might be misunderstanding the article, but the police found a credit card record and arrested Alex, correct? At which point he (rightfully so) disputed and was able to make a case that his details had been cloned and he was actually the victim of identify theft. The question surely is whether this was supplied to the council, or if (as far as they were concerned) there was a situation involving children that they had no confirmation on either way. if it was the latter, I can understand the position. If the former, then I hope Alex will seek compensation and justice as far as that needs to go.

  • Let’s hope that justice is done, and that the officers involved are held to account for their actions. But unlike how they’ve acted I would like to see a fair investigation that listens to both sides and is based on the evidence – the officers involved may just learn something from such a process. Very best wishes to Alex.

  • Nonconformistradical 3rd Jan '15 - 6:05pm

    @Samuel Griffiths

    Have you actually read what Alex had to say on his blog when this matter first became public? If not see http://lansonboy.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/the-truth-about-why-i-resigned-and.html

    and then think about the chief executive of Cornwall Council, Andrew Kerr allegedly trying to force Alex to resign – apparently without any kind of investigation into the recent allegations actually being conducted….

  • Tony Dawson 3rd Jan '15 - 6:10pm

    Well done, Alex.

    It seems to me that there is a need for an INDEPENDENT inquiry into the conduct and actions of the Chief Executive who may well require disciplining.

  • Bill le Breton 3rd Jan '15 - 6:18pm

    Alex is a seriously good campaigner. He is also intelligent, articulate, knowledgeable , very experienced and a challenger of the status quo. Need I write more?

  • Tsar Nicolas 4th Jan '15 - 9:07am

    As I have previously commented, one of the problems inherent in the current councillor/senior officer relationship is the existence of a strict code of conduct in the case of the former, and nothing in the case of the latter.

    I always had the sneaking suspicion that when these codes of conduct were introduced (broadly in their current form) by Bliar’s government, they were as much an attempt to wreck local democracy as the introduction of cabinet-led local councils.

    If there was a code of conduct binding chief executives in the same way that local councillors are constrained, the CEO of Cornwall would never have behaved in this disgraceful manner.

  • Excellent news for the start of 2015, Andrew Kerr must go!

  • richard boyd 4th Jan '15 - 5:58pm

    Used to be an independent panel (The Adjudication Panel for England) that could have such allegations referred to it
    by The Standards Board for England. Did this for over 10 years then got abolished in the first year of the Coalition Govt.

    Richard Boyd OBE DL

  • Mark Inskip 4th Jan '15 - 6:50pm

    @Richard Boyd – not sure how The Adjudication Panel for England would have been any use in this instance. It could only judge on alleged breaches of English local authorities’ codes of conduct by elected members of those authorities.

    Here the issue is with the conduct of the authority’s Chief Executive.

  • richard boyd 5th Jan '15 - 3:19pm

    Mark,

    Thanks for the comment. The Councillor had the right to refer himself/chief executive to the Standards Board.
    I recall two cases where similar contretemps occurred and one between a minority party leader and the chief
    executive, in Lancashire springs to mind. It is, sadly, now , academic – as we (The Panel) no longer exist. I was
    appointed, along with the then Leader of BANES, being the two LD Councillors in the reservoir of tribunal members.
    She resigned after a couple of years, which left me as the only LD for the remaining 9 y

  • richard boyd 5th Jan '15 - 3:21pm

    Mark,

    Thanks for the comment. The Councillor had the right to refer himself/chief executive to the Standards Board.
    I recall two cases where similar contretemps occurred and one between a minority party leader and the chief
    executive, in Lancashire springs to mind. It is, sadly, now , academic – as we (The Panel) no longer exist. I was
    appointed, along with the then Leader of BANES, being the two LD Councillors in the reservoir of tribunal members.
    She resigned after a couple of years, which left me as the only LD for the remaining 9 years. One of the Standards
    Board Legal Beagles left and became an LD councillor for a London Borough, when our work ended.

    Richarfd

  • Samuel Griffiths

    I think you have misunderstood the article. The council acted after an investigation had been concluded, the council acted sometime after the conclusion of the investigation. Given the investigation had been concluded and there was not evidence to charge all of this information would have been available to the council so the only defence for the council would be if the Met screwed up and didn’t supply the proper case files.

    This may have happened, but I know who is more likely to have made the error between the council interpreting a case file and acting appropriately to the Met’s ability to send files.

    I don’t see that a code of conduct for CEOs would have helped in this case as it appears from the outside as if legal levers are the appropriate approach, a code of conduct in those circumstances would be comparatively toothless.

  • can anyone tell me were I can find the police letter to Alex.
    as all are going on about it, but has anyone seen it?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tom Reeve
    What strikes me about this discussion is what is absent from it. We are debating how to fund services to the last decimal place, and nobody mentions that the we...
  • paul barker
    I wasn't able to make any of the Party discussions on this but I would have supported forming this Coalition anyway. I feel that Libdem & Green members have...
  • Neil Hickman
    The current World Cup, beside being a monumental exercise in chiselling, is a massive ego trip for one of the most unpleasant and dangerous individuals on the p...
  • Tom Bailey
    Thumbs up to this article. FWIW, I feel that something has changed in this Iran~US~Israel “debacle”, that will transform the region. Iran, in their Memora...
  • expats
    David Raw 14th Jun '26 - 1:14pm; David, Jack Priestley, obviously, never watched Millwall or Leeds Utd in the 1970's... I read ‘The Good Companions’ ...