Some evidence that Lib Dem supporters are a liberal and coherent grouping

There are a couple of interesting titbits from the latest Sunday Times / YouGov poll, published at the weekend, and published in full here.

For years, opposition parties have levelled the charge at Lib Dems that our supporters are chiefly a ‘neither of the above’ option, that the party is merely a repository for disenchanted protest votes. For years, Lib Dems have refuted the charge, arguing that the party is the only one which has continued to stand by its founding ideology, liberalism.

So I always take a close look at detailed opinion poll data to see if there are noticeable differences between the responses to questions of Lib Dem voters compared with those who identify as Labour or Tory. Mostly there’s little of significance.

For example, YouGov asked ‘The bosses of the Royal Bank of Scotland were forced to quit when it became effectively nationalised. Should the heads of Lloyds Banking Group, Sir Victor Blank and Eric Daniels, also be made to quit now it is majority publicly-owned?’ No matter which party those polled said they voted for, broadly two-thirds argued they should be sacked, while one-fifth said they should be allowed to keep their jobs.

But the response of the public to the final three questions in the poll did suggest a noticeable difference between supporters of the Lib Dems, and those of Labour and Tories, a difference worth highlighting:

1. YouGov asked: Should America and Britain be willing to talk to the Taliban in Afghanistan in order to achieve a peace deal or not?

Lib Dems: Yes 73%; No 18%
(The equivalent figures for Labour was 67%/25%, and for the Tories 64%/27%).

2. YouGov asked: A few days ago there was a protest in Luton against British soldiers returning from Iraq who are described as “butchers” and “baby killers”. What was your attitude to this?

Lib Dems:
Such protests are offensive and should be banned, and those who proceed with them prosecuted for public order offences 33%;
However offensive people find such protests, it is the right of anybody to protest in a free society 54%.
(The equivalent figures for Labour was 51%/39%, and for the Tories 65%/27%).

3. YouGov asked: Following recent murders of soldiers and police in Northern Ireland, how likely or unlikely do you think it is that there will be a return to the levels of violence of the 1970s and 1980s?

Lib Dems: very/fairly likely 14%; very/fairly unlikely 80%
(The equivalent figures for Labour was 22%/72%, and for the Tories 26%/66%).

On the basis of their answers to these three questions, therefore, it seems that Lib Dems are – (1) more willing to talk to the Taliban, (2) more likely to stick up for free speech regardless of their own views, and (3) more likely to have an optimistic view of the current Northern Ireland troubles – than supporters of the other parties.

From which (admittedly small) sample, we might conclude that generally:

1. Lib Dems supporters are more open, liberal and optimistic about some of the biggest issues facing the UK;
2. Labour and Tory supporters are more likely to agree with each other than with the Lib Dems; and
3. Lib Dem supporters do identify with core elements of the party’s philosophy and policies.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds and Polls.
Advert

11 Comments

  • Do you have any reason to think the differences in the answers to the first of those questions are statistically significant?

  • WHS

    Are those figures for 2 the right way round – I would have thought Tory voters would be more hostile to that sort of thing

  • David Morton 17th Mar '09 - 2:31am

    Two quick points.

    1. With admirable honesty you admit in your article in most of the questions there is little difference. However doesn’t that destroy your thesis as least as far as this poll is concerned ? You base the article on the 3 questions where the results are atypical.

    2. You don’t mention or acknowledge the sampling size problem. When you look at polling subsets because the sample size is so much smaller the margin of error is much larger than on a conventional poll. Most of the examples you have cited are well with the margin of error.

    Hywel,
    yes the Tory figures on the Protest question have been posted the wrong way round.

  • David Morton 17th Mar '09 - 7:43am

    Alix,
    Yes you are right. I have checked again and the figures are the right way around.

  • David Morton 17th Mar '09 - 11:31am

    IPSOS MORI
    Con 42 – 6
    Lab 32 + 4
    LD 14 – 3

  • Simon Titley 17th Mar '09 - 1:06pm

    Stephen Tall’s basic point, that Liberal Democrat supporters have identifiable characteristics, is correct.

    However, there is much better evidence for this than the poll evidence he cites.

    See my LDV opinion piece (22 November 2008) for the relevant data:

    https://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-the-bnp-membership-list-and-the-lessons-for-lib-dems-6175.html

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ David Symonds, “Remember that Michael Foot and Margaret Thatcher were united in their hatred of the SDP/Liberal Alliance because they feared a new ...
  • Mick Taylor
    @TristanWard. Well, yes, but if you gain power with no reference to principles and then try to implement the principles you didn't mention, it usually goes tits...
  • David Evans
    Tristan, ... and apologies for the mis-spelling of your name. David...
  • David Evans
    Hi Tristran, I think you missed one here in your response to @David Allen. If you look at it a bit closer, I think you will find that David was using Irony....
  • Tristan Ward
    @David Allen "If what you are in politics for is simply to get a few more bums on seats in the Commons" If you get enough of them you can do stuff that ch...