The knife-edge Minnesota Senate race is being recounted, and you can browse some of the ballot papers under scrutiny here. I particularly liked the attempt to disqualify one ballot paper because it had a fingerprint … and as for the Lizard People Party, there were clearly robbed of a vote.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
- The Falklands are under threat again and we can’t rely on America to save us
- Defining our future in Burnham Britain
- William Wallace writes: The case for higher taxes
- “Palestine should be run by Palestinians” so why won’t Britain reckon with what it did?
- Britain should confront history honestly, not selectively
Search
Op-eds
-
Four challenges in Andy Burnham’s in-tray (Callum Robertson)
-
A plea to our new Prime Minister – abolish me! (Tim Leunig)
-
Mathew on Monday: Burnham has made a promising start. Now comes the hard part (Mathew Hulbert)
-
Orange with Bits (Brendan Roberts)
-
If Andy Burnham isn’t the Messiah… Good (Roz Savage MP)
-
"Winston and David" on stage
-
The Joy of Six 1551
-
Reform MP starts digging her own Standards hole
-
Kevin Keegan: The humble superstar of the Seventies
-
Labour councillor joins Lib Dems in Portsmouth
-
Andy Burnham's Big Promises - Now Comes the Difficult Part
-
Péter Magyar will ask Judit Polgár to become president of Hungary
-
After Dark podcast on the R101 airship disaster
Recent Comments
Peter Hirst
Concerning our purpose, in the present political context we exist to act as an alternative. The Liberal Democrats are the only Party that might sacrifice politi...
Jana
“ This in turn is exacerbating a mental health crisis as young people feel a sense of hopelessness about their current economic circumstances.” I work wi...- Peter Hirst
Ian is right. And there is a wider message here. Whether it's transport, local green spaces or affordable housing until everyone is connected we suffer as a soc... 
Bridget Fox
Totally agree that standing for the GLA is very worthwhile. I was a list candidate back in 2012 and though I didn't get elected, it was a fun campaign to be par...
Chris Cory
Anger at local government reform ? Part of the reorganisation is a greater role for first teir councils. If we beleive in devolving power to the most local l...
6 Comments
A brilliant site – UK should do the same.
Best website ever! 🙂
I like this:
“Even though the voter filled in the bubble next to Barkley’s name, a Franken representative said what appear to be eraser marks over Franken’s bubble indicated the voter intended to vote for Franken.”
Ok we’ve all got a bit desperate about arguing over spoilt ballots in close races but I think I’d feel a bit embarrassed arging that.
I think the Lizard people is void for uncertainly – though I can see your point.
Tim – I don’t see what would be gained by doing this in the UK. The vast majority of spoilt ballots are incredibly dull. This site does little to educate the reader as it doesn’t give any information about the rules regarding assessment of spoilt ballots. There is a link to the relevant statute but it’s hardly a user-friendly approach.
Using the UK rules the vast majority of those ballots are pretty easy to make a decision on – and most of them seem clear under Minnesotan law.
One thing the UK system has going for it is this. Because people have been voting in the same way for many years the vast majority of permutations have been considered either by the courts or in manuals of standard practice used by Returning Officers.
The general rule is that where the intention is clear the vote should stand
However in the US where different ballot machines are used (in some cases from county to county), and can be changed from year to year no such body of opinion and case law can develop. This is a supportive – thought not conclusive – argument against a change in voting methods.
There are confidentiality issues over publishing a ballot paper with an identifying mark as well.
If it identifies the voter then we know who they voted for. If not then…..
Hywel “The vast majority of spoilt ballots are incredibly dull.”
Apart from last May in Scotland of course.
They were significant (in part because of a strangely designed ballot IIRC).
What I was referring to is that most spoilt ballots are blank or people voting for more candidates than they should. As opposed to the smiley faces/question mark/”he’s the one for me” written on the paper.
That held true for most in Scotland as most were a case of spoiling them in ways which are already understood and there are accepted ways of dealing with them. 2 Xs when your asked to vote for one candidate is a spoilt ballot paper.
That doesn’t mean that there shouldn’t be questions asked about the ballot papers etc in Scotland of course.
The actual ways in which they were spoilt were still pretty dull(two crosses rather than one).
If we are prepared to allow party workers to see the voting papers on election night, when we sit and watch them being counted up, then I don’t see why we should not let people in general see them. If we are worried about the numbers, they could be shown without.
It would also be useful training for people doing the counting and monitoring the counters.
When someone suggests making politics more open, the reaction should not be “I don’t see what would be gained by doing this”, but rather “Is there any compelling reason not to do it?”. We are liberals and believe in openness!