Swinson slams eggs-ess packaging (geddit?)

As you prepare to devour your innocent-looking Easter eggs this holiday weekend, bear in mind this piece of research by Lib Dem MP Jo Swinson: Easter eggs only take up 40% of their packaging, and remain one of the most wasteful products on supermarket shelves. You can read the BBC news report detailing Jo’s investigations HERE.

Jo comments:

While it is encouraging that the amount of packaging used for Easter eggs has gone down, they remain one of the most excessively packaged and wasteful products available. On average the Easter eggs still take up only 40% of their packaging, so there is still more that can be done to reduce it even more. It is also important to make sure not just that packaging is reduced, but that it is recyclable and that is made clear to consumers. The progress that has been made in the past year is encouraging, but manufacturers must go much further.”

Jo’s press release has a number of detailed and fascinating notes to editors – see below – such that I can’t help wondering if her research was assisted by the party’s Head of Innovations, LDV’s own chocophile Mark Pack, in the non-packaging portions of the Easter eggs they sampled.

Jo’s Notes to Editors

1. Lindt has maintained its title for a third year running as the company whose packaging is the most excessive, with an Easter egg which takes up only 9% of the volume of the packaging. While Marks & Spencer have reduced their packaging by removing cardboard, they have replaced it with plastic wrapping which is not recyclable, thereby increasing landfill waste.

2. The manufacturer who showed the most improvement on last year was Nestlé, and the one who showed least improvement was Terry’s, whose packaging has actually increased since 2008.

3. Sainsbury’s, Terry’s, Cadbury and Green & Black’s eggs all produce no landfill waste.

4. Companies have reduced the weight of their Easter egg packaging by an average of 33.5% compared to last year. Nestlé and Green & Black’s have all taken the initiative of removing all plastic from their packaging and replacing it with cardboard, which is more widely recycled. They have also redesigned their boxes creatively to use less cardboard, moving away from the standard cuboid box.

5. The average total weight of packaging for an Easter egg was 84g in 2007 and 82.6g in 2008, but shrunk to 45.7g this year. Considerable improvements have also been made in the amount and detail of environmental information included on Easter egg packaging. Several companies advertise their packaging reductions prominently in their marketing campaigns, suggesting they believe this is important to consumers.

For a full copy of Jo Swinson’s Easter egg packaging report, please click here.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Martin Kinsella 10th Apr '09 - 5:58pm

    Fuss over nothing.

    Sorry, but as capable as Swinson is, this is just a waste of time and effort.

  • Terry Gilbert 13th Apr '09 - 1:08pm

    I don’t agree with the above two comments – we were impressed that the two Nestle eggs our kids were given had cardboard instead of plastic packaging, making it possible to recycle it, unlike the Cadbury’s one’s they got last year. Are you listening Cadbury’s? (Pity we are still boycotting Nestle over baby milk in the developing world really, otherwise we might have bought them ourselves!)

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Alex Macfie
    @David Raw: So? They were exclusively Lib Dem ~ Tory battleground seats (we lost seats to Labour in 1997), won by us when the Conservatives were self-destructin...
  • nigel hunter
    Roland you mean GBnews is in trouble so they have to 'stir it' to get an audience?...
  • Roland
    >” I’d expect Floella to be polite but highly critical of the delays in compensating victims of the Home Office and, indeed, those administering the Sche...
  • Cassie
    'Not all farmers are rich...' Indeed. The average income of lowland grazing livestock farms in 2022-23 was £21,600. Upland farms lost £10,400 on average fr...
  • Roland
    Re. Lee Anderson Been here before not that long ago… This is about creating “news” for GBnews.....