Symantec, the BBC and hype: an tale of how not to report online crime

Online fraud is a serious problem, but that shouldn’t be a reason to turn off your critical faculties when a firm that sells software to deal with online fraud issues a news release on the topic.

On Monday the software firm Symantec issued a press release, which included this combination of claims:

While stolen credit card numbers sell for as little as $0.10 to $25 per card, the average advertised stolen credit card limit observed by Symantec was more than $4,000. Symantec has calculated that the potential worth of all credit cards advertised during the reporting period was $5.3 billion.

The $5.3 billion figure comes from taking the number of stolen credit cards and multiplying it up by $4,000.

But that doesn’t give any real sense of the value of the stolen cards because if a criminal is using a stolen card, they aren’t necessarily going to be able to use it all the way up to its limit:

  • There may already be items outstanding on the card; how often is there nothing outstanding on your card? Even if you pay it off in full each month, it is still quite possible for there to be an outstanding amount on it all the time.
  • His or her transactions may result in the card being stopped before the limit is reached.
  • Not all of the stolen cards are still usable. Many of those for sale have already been blocked.

The give away that this $4,000 per card number doesn’t really mean anything is that the price for buying a stolen card is as low $0.10 – $25, as the Symantec quote makes clear. If stolen cards were really worth something approaching $4,000, they wouldn’t be going that cheap.

Read it all very carefully and the information is there – “potential worth” is the Symantec opt-out that allows the firm to say, “hey, we didn’t say anything untrue”. But the $5.3 billion figures is misleading, and put a big figure in a press release and what do you expect to happen…?

Enter stage left, the BBC and its screaming headline, “Online fraudsters ‘steal £3.3bn'” (which is $5.3 billion translated into pounds and pence). Sounds awful doesn’t it? Bit of a shame it ain’t true though. Even the BBC seems to realise this, because part way through the report it admits:

Symantec said it was likely that many of the cards offered for sale were invalid or cancelled.

In other words, ‘the figure in our headline was worked out based on assumptions that aren’t true’ (no cards invalid, no cards cancelled, full limit available on each). Oops.

P.S. The BBC is by no means alone in taking a meaningless number, repeating it and wrapping it hyperbole. Ironically, included in the other culprits are specialist news outlets who you’d have thought should know about such things, such as Tech Radar (who manage to both say stolen credit cards are really cheap – only 7p! – and also worth huge amounts – £2,650 on average! I guess we’re not meant to ask why criminals sell cards for just 7p if they’re worth so much more on average).

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Terry Gilbert 29th Nov '08 - 9:44pm

    Quite right Mark. The value in a stolen credit card is only potential value, which varies according to several factors, including the cardholders diligence in stopping the card. Even for actual goods, you don’t get full value. As a Probation Officer, I once came across a ‘customer’ who told me that for stolen property ‘I usually get a third [of its value], but if its really hot I only get a tenth’. Refreshing honesty in one so crooked, I’m sure you’ll agree.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Paul R
    Jana - There is no mention of any form of “political union” anywhere in the EU Treaties. Indeed, this was explicitly clarified by the other leaders in t...
  • Daniel Walker
    @theakes "first past the post was a winner for us in 2024. Suggest we keep our heads down and live with it." If your opinion on an electoral system—...
  • Paul Holmes
    Rob, you also say that we can't be the party of the NHS or the Environment because Labour and the Greens have those. Surely it is a mistake to abandon whole are...
  • Paul Holmes
    Rob, you offer two possible groups of key target supporters for the Liberal Democrats. However, both are, as you note, just subsets of the affluent middle class...
  • Peter Wrigley
    @Jana: I regrade myself as an extremest for liberalism: the maximum amount of individual freedom that doesn't infringe the freedom others. I’m also pretty ke...