This image was among those rejected by the Government committee that oversaw the “stronger in” campaign. Saatchi and Saatchi complained that all their best work was vetoed by someone or other.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Can “Manchesterism” work for our rural communities? (Ray Georgeson)
-
What would Keynes do? (Charlie Larkin)
-
Why Britain should be wary of Andy Burnham’s Devolution Revolution (Iain Donaldson)
-
“Build, baby, build” but don’t lower our ambitions on affordability (Victor Chamberlain)
-
Twenty-six years of evidence on drugs. Twenty-six years of cowardice. (Tanya Park)
-
Tastes change ~
-
Nine in ten paying more than necessary in Vehicle Excise Duty
-
A radical agenda but can Burnham deliver?
-
Reg Calvert and his boarding school of rock
-
A shocking abuse of the legal system where the rich try to bully the weak and poor into submission
-
The Joy of Six 1540
-
Are we doing enough to insure against climate change?
Recent Comments
Paul Turnbull
I work in architecture and construction and find this article infuriating. New high density housing is essentially being regulated out of existence. Viability w...
Jana
I’m afraid the comments around some of our performances are a little too ‘rose-tinted’. For example, it was not ‘unlucky’ to lose Bushey Park by 10% w...- Jana
“.. pointing out where Burnham’s No10 North will be located and reminding us how much British land mass lies even further to the North isn’t particularly ... 
Steve Trevethan
Might the attached article be of relevance/use? https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2026/06/30/does-burnham-understand-economics/...
David Evans
Excellent result for Martin Wrigley and the team he supports and who have supported him so well. They were never going to let Reform win and they totally deser...
