Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Can we afford the Triple Lock? Not as a low tax party (Joe Wright)
-
Labour’s new vape tax is disastrous policymaking (Rees Southern)
-
Welcome to my day: 5 October 2026 – it’s beginning to feel a lot like AGM season… (Mark Valladares)
-
Observations of an ex pat: Stormy Red Sea (Tom Arms)
-
By-Election Report 01.10.26 (Joe Nutt)
-
Ian Anderson on the old hippies who used punk to get on in music
-
Lawrence Hogben, Pressure and the meteorologists of D-Day
-
Greens split over 'Zionism is racism' policy
-
One in the eye for the Tory Bayeux Tapestry as Labour hits back
-
The Joy of Six 1586
-
What do Britain's death-penalty cheerleaders have to say about Christa Pike?
-
This is Lorelei: Billy Come Back
-
A Week in Politics #8
-
Reform continue to block journalists from doing their job
Recent Comments
Nick Baird
@Alex @Rees - I was referring to the quoted surveys by VPZ and E-Cigarette Direct, who have a vested interest in selling vapes and are effectively claiming that...
Rees Southern
Hi Nick, as Alex points out, ASH is not a vested interest. Nor are the other organisations mentioned in my article, including the Royal College of Physicians, C...
Matt (Bristol)
I dont think lib dems should be a low tax or high tax party. I would like them (Or someone else) to be a subsidiarist, consensualist party, whereby levels of ta...
Alex Macfie
@Nick Baird: Since when was ASH a "vested interest"? And vested in what?...
Chris Caswill
Thanks for this, Joe. I am only missing a Wealth Tax option. I also support the comments from the two David’s, Allen and Warren. Four problems with Burnham�...
