British writer Edward Docx has taken to the pages of the Guardian to praise the work the Liberal Democrats did in the last Parliaemnt and how this will become very clear when George Osborne announces his Autumn Statement next week.
The 20,000 people who joined the party in the wake of our election meltdown know that, as do the voters who are turning back to us.
Docx made several key points about the Liberal Democrat actions in the coalition years:
There were two oppositions in the last parliament: Labour and the Liberal Democrats. And, this week more than ever, it is worth saying that only the latter made any difference to the real lives of real people. Why? Because they were in government.
Refuse, in other words, to allow Osborne’s self-serving narrative to present itself as the only story. And, of course, this is exactly what the Liberal Democrats were doing day-in and day-out during the last parliament on behalf of the majority of reasonable and none-ideological people who did not vote Conservative.
Danny Alexander has taken some stick in his time, some of it deserved, but he was able to hold the Tories back:
For every fiscal decision in the last government, the Liberal Democrats (through Danny Alexander) asked for a distributional analysis so that they could see where the pain of cuts would be felt – whether on the richer or the less well off. What this meant in practice was that every time the Tories attempted something that placed an unfair burden on the poor, the Liberal Democrats first illuminated the policy for what it was and then either blocked it (often repeatedly) or insisted upon a reciprocal burden being placed on the better off.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
State of Play: a classic BBC political drama revisited
The Joy of Six 1585
Has Ed Davey got it wrong on the triple lock?
A fair pension for every generation: a Liberal Democrat case for reform
Nick Baird 
Paul Turnbull 
expats 
Jana 
Ruth Bright 