Tag Archives: glenn mulcaire

Mark Pack

Andy Coulson under fire over fresh phone-hacking allegations

By Mark Pack | Tue 4th May 2010 - 4:20 pm

The Guardian reports:

David Cameron’s close adviser, Andy Coulson, has come under fresh attack after the disclosure of new evidence of the News of the World’s role in the illegal interception of the royal household’s voicemail messages during his time as editor.

The evidence is in the outline for a book planned by the private investigator at the centre of the affair, Glenn Mulcaire. The outline was written before Mulcaire signed a deal with the paper which stopped the book’s publication and gagged him from speaking about the scandal.

The outline directly contradicts the News of the World’s claim that Mulcaire broke the

…

Continue reading »
Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 5 Comments
Mark Pack

Forget tweets, it’s Andy Coulson people should be talking about

By Mark Pack | Tue 16th February 2010 - 10:19 pm

Yes, someone said something foolish on Twitter. Yes, he then dug himself into a hole with an explanation that doesn’t stack up. Yes, he shouldn’t have done it.

But even for a Twitter-holic like me, you’ve got to wonder quite why this story is garnering so much online chatter in comparison with the news we may be deprived of the chance to find out the truth as to whether or not one of David Cameron’s top advisers headed up an organisation that carried out systematic and widespread criminal activity.

That is the sort of moral blindness and indifference to rule breaking which …

Continue reading »
Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 1 Comment

Hughes hits out at News of the World phone-tapper

By the founding editor | Wed 29th November 2006 - 1:43 pm

Simon HughesGlenn Mulcaire is reported to be the journalist who tapped Simon Hughes‘ phone messages, leading to his high-profile “outing” during the leadership campaign of 2006.

Commenting on the opening of the ‘royal phone tapping’ trial today, Simon Hughes said:

Intercepting personal voicemail messages is a completely unacceptable breach of privacy – whether the victim is a royal prince, a politician, or someone completely out of the public eye. 

People who leave messages and those intended to receive them are all entitled to have private conversations. We live in an age where invasions of privacy are becoming more frequent. This does not make the practice any more acceptable. 

Continue reading »
Posted in News | Also tagged | 2 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ Jack, Starmer knew how to have good relations with the Trades Unions. Pity it didn't last. As soon as he was PM he was suspending his own MPs for doing wha...
  • Richard Dickson
    Building a brand does indeed involve consideration of WHAT (issues and policies). But more important for creating lasting memories and trust, and winning heads,...
  • Paul Reynolds
    Thanks very much Rob for setting out the issue of LD strategy, and the essential framework for the Strategy Review. Best wishes to the review team with a diffic...
  • Anne Williams
    Just a couple of comments. The messaging wasn't helpful. First of all, the Party tried to position itself as the opposition to Reform. When that became untenabl...
  • Jana
    Is one of our key characteristics not that we are not extremists? The Greens have some quite extremist environmental views and an extremist ‘open borders�...