Tag Archives: high court judgement

Nascot Lawn respite centre wins High Court reprieve

Nascot Lawn, the only respite centre in Hertfordshire for children with complex needs, was due to close in May. Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group announced in November that it was withdrawing funding for this vital service.

Several parents got together to fight this ruling. And yesterday, the High Court found that Herts Valley CCG needs to work with Hertfordshire County Council on the future plan for Nascot Lawn. Funding is now guaranteed until August. If they cannot reach an agreement on keeping Nascot Lawn open, Hertfordshire County Council can refer the …

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 2 Comments

According to Article 50, once it has been triggered there is no way back

treatyIt is Liberal Democrat policy to hold a referendum on the terms of Brexit, but I think it is clear from reading Article 50 and the High Court judgment that once we have notified the European Council that we are leaving there is no method to stop us leaving.

Article 50 of the Treaty reads:

  1. Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.
  2. A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council, acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.
  3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 42 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKevin White 30th Mar - 2:09pm
    Couldn't agree more. TheFederal Board is utterly wrong.
  • User AvatarFiona 30th Mar - 2:02pm
    @Expats, I agree that not everyone would have the sense to turn around if they see a park or car park is busy, and that...
  • User AvatarGlenn 30th Mar - 1:58pm
    The Derbyshire police aren't just playing with their new drones, they've dyed the water in a quarry black to make it less attractive to visit!...
  • User AvatarPhil Wainewright 30th Mar - 1:55pm
    We do not need a leadership election to "decide what kind of party we want to be." The two are completely different things. Indeed most...
  • User AvatarSue Sutherland 30th Mar - 1:53pm
    At 73 I quite like the term “our elderly”. It’s cosy and loving and goes with “look after” , but it definitely doesn’t apply to...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 30th Mar - 1:33pm
    Strong statement from Lord Sumption (? spelling) on World at One just now, stressing the dangers to our liberties of the excessive use of police...