Tag Archives: house-building

Yes – in my back yard: The Lib Dems need to TRULY be the party of housebuilding

Embed from Getty Images

To NIMBY or not to NIMBY, that is the question that has plagued local parties since time immemorial. But to be a progressive party today, we need to embrace a radical house-building agenda. That means supporting development projects locally across the country, and gritting our teeth and taking a constructive stance towards the Governments planning reform.

Nationally, the Liberal Democrats talk the good talk. Our manifesto includes ambitious housebuilding plans that seek to tackle the huge supply deficit in the housing market. Locally, it’s a different story altogether. It’s a faustian pact that most local politicians have to make regardless of party: the reason is that homeowners vote, and opposing more development, that will bring the value of their houses down, will win them over.

This is the unspoken reason many local parties oppose development in their area. They’ll couch it in terms of “inappropriate development” or “lack of infrastructure”, but the truth is they don’t want to see development at all. They’re caving in to parochial local homeowner pressure and it’s deeply regressive. We need to support homeownership, not homeowners. The simple fact of the matter is that you can’t be a NIMBY and progressive at the same time.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 13 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Garlick
    Council housing with no right to buy unless the whole of the purchase income remains locally and can only be used to build more council housing....
  • David Garlick
    The benefits of taking a drug like cannabis out of the hands of criminals and providing a strongly regulated, grown in the UK, supply seems a no brainer to me....
  • Alex Macfie
    The French run-off system can be gamed. Say there's a candidate (let's call him Bordan Jardella) who is highly likely to get into the run-off but you are desper...
  • Nick Hopkinson
    Thank you for your informative posts, Tom. Was it intentional to run a piece linking Trump, fruitcakes and nuts?...
  • Mick Taylor
    Now then Peter. The Greens are no longer primarily for the environment and Labour are defintely not for the working class. What do you think we're for?...