Tag Archives: john sharked

NewsHound

LIbLInk: John Sharkey: Why I fought to get a pardon for gay and bi men

By NewsHound | Wed 8th February 2017 - 10:25 am

Much of the coverage of the new law pardoning thousands of gay men for historic convictions became law last week. The Lib Dem peer who fought for this for years, John Sharkey, has written for Pink News about why this was such an important issue for him.

He started with an account of how homosexual acts became a crime in the first place – almost casually.

On 6 August 1885, late at night in the Commons debate on the Criminal Law Amendment Act, Henry Labouchère suddenly produced an amendment to the Bill before the House. This amendment criminalised homosexual acts. The only discussion was over the penalty to be imposed. Labouchère had proposed a maximum of one year. Sir Henry James suggested two years and Labouchère agreed. The whole debate had four speakers, including Labouchère. It lasted four minutes and consisted of a total of 440 words, but 75,000 men were convicted under this amendment, and Alan Turing was one of those.

At university, he had been taught by Turing’s closest friends and got to know his story: 

Continue reading »
Posted in LibLink | Also tagged and | 1 Comment
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Roland
    @Tristan Ward - "So, assuming there are no tax loopholes, what is the point of earning another £1 if the government take away 83p of it?" Depends on ...
  • David Warren
    It's a great pity that we only have one candidate who is eligible for this key role!...
  • John Kelly
    I guess we knew it but nonetheless it is disappointing that year after year the autumn Conference these days is always on the south coast - reinforcing the sout...
  • Tristan Ward
    @PM "The big divide is between {property owners} and renters. If you are serious about tacking inequality we’d need to factor in the economic benefits ...
  • Tristan Ward
    @Roland "whilst the salary was taxed at 98% there were other ways (before 1979) of taking the monies tax free". I'm not really sure what your point is. ...