Peter Hadfield, formerly of the New Scientist, has taken to YouTube to tackle climate change sceptics as he recently explained on the Guardian’s Environment Blog:
After questioning and listening to hundreds of climate change “sceptics,” I have found that not all are conspiracy theorists or religious fundamentalists. Many are keen to learn about the science of climate change, but they have been learning about it from rather dubious sources.
So two years ago I began a series of videos on YouTube to explain the science, and rebut urban myths that spin round the internet and end up on the opinion pages of the Daily Express and the Wall Street Journal. The result has been astonishing. My channel, Potholer54, now has over 27,000 subscribers. The videos have been mirrored by others all over the internet, and several university lecturers have asked if they can use it in their environmental science classes. Most importantly, former sceptics tell me the videos have changed their minds about the reality of climate change.
That success, however, comes at a price. It means looking at the science – not scary and unrealistic images of submerged cities. It means accepting the fact that Al Gore is not always right, and he should not be defended when he’s wrong. It means acknowledging that while sceptics like Christopher Monckton and Martin Durkin fabricate a lot of their facts, many environmental activists tend to exaggerate theirs.
George Thomas As you have pointed out, the benefits assessment is written to acknowledge people have fluctuating conditions and should assess on what they can do reliably, th...
PM @ Mick, @ Jana
"What services are you going to cut to get taxes down?"
I've just noticed that Rob Blackie, in his latest post, has quoted a fig...
Peter Davies While I agree that private development will bring down prices and eventually rents, presumption against building in the planning laws is not the major problem. ...
Simon McGrath The picture is in the article if put through an AI detector comes out as high probability AI generated...
Simon McGrath @James, it is quite clearly to to pass itself off as associated with the Party by using the party name.
The website is very odd. There are lots of strange b...