Tag Archives: medical innovations bill

LibLink: Norman Lamb MP: Why we had to axe Lord Saatchi’s bill and think again

Last month, Dominic Nutt, one of the advocates of Lord Saatchi’s Medical Innovations Bill, argued on this site in our Independent View slot that the Bill should be given Commons time for debate.

So what’s happened since then? Well, the Bill will make no further progress after the intervention of Liberal Democrat Ministers. Norman Lamb wrote a sensitively worded article for the Telegraph last week where he showed empathy for those with serious life-threatening illnesses, but said that he couldn’t allow them to potentially be preyed upon by unscrupulous people:

We must do everything we can to ensure patients get access to the best possible treatments, including removing any unnecessary barriers to innovation

So when I first heard about Lord Saatchi’s Medical Innovation Bill I was immediately attracted to its purpose.

We must seek to ensure that doctors are confident that they are able to try innovative treatments within a clear framework which protects patient safety and safeguards them from litigation.

I have enormous sympathy for all those who have been through the awful experience of not being offered treatment which they believe might offer a chance of survival or of improving their condition.

But getting the law right in this area is incredibly important. We have to avoid the risk of unintended consequences.

The Liberal Democrats have listened to the concerns of patient organisations, research charities, legal bodies, royal colleges and medical unions who have told us the Bill in its current form could actually put patient safety at risk.

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 3 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • John Kelly
    @jana "At the very least the Liberal Democrats should demanding trade sanctions against Israel but, I’m afraid, the Party seems afraid to take a principled ...
  • Miranda Pinch
    Joe, you have excelled in misinterpretation. Israel has alienated almost the whole world. It started badly in 1948 and has continued that route since. My moth...
  • Peter Chambers
    > several people having been offered full time jobs that paid more than minimum wage but then refusing the position on the basis they believed they would be ...
  • Nick Baird
    The quoted comparison between welfare income vs work is deceptive, because it assumes that anyone taking a job loses access to *ALL* welfare payments, which oft...
  • Tim Leunig
    Looking forward to seeing lots of you there!...